RootsChat.Com

General => Ancestral Family Tree DNA Testing => Topic started by: pollycat76 on Tuesday 29 June 21 10:43 BST (UK)

Title: Confusing Ancestry Results
Post by: pollycat76 on Tuesday 29 June 21 10:43 BST (UK)
My son M matches his father's brother D with 789 Cms. Ancestry say on M's results that D is 1st-2nd Cousin. D's results show my son M as nephew. I see from DNA Painter that 789Cms is more likely to be half uncle ! M's other known cousins have 770 and 892 Cms matches respectively. Other than the obvious, is there an explanation for this "Uncle's" result ?
Title: Re: Confusing Ancestry Results
Post by: IgorStrav on Tuesday 29 June 21 18:21 BST (UK)
Whilst I can't answer your specific example, I do know that the shared DNA varies very extensively between 'equal' relatives.

My 2nd cousin once removed (who I know, and is documented, we are related via my great aunt), shares 17cM DNA with me.  DNA painter has that relationship as a 1% likelihood.

It's previously been suggested here that there must have been an NPA for that amount of DNA share

However, knowing the circumstances/background of my great grandmother, (wife of Metropolitan policeman, close family, 12 children, when would she have had the time???) I'm more inclined to believe it's an outlier.

Title: Re: Confusing Ancestry Results
Post by: Gadget on Tuesday 29 June 21 21:16 BST (UK)
Quote
M's other known cousins have 770 and 892 Cms matches respectively

Is this is with M or D ?

Assuming that it is with M, are you able to find how many cMs they share with D. Also, have you checked through the shared matches that M has with D.


Gadget
Title: Re: Confusing Ancestry Results
Post by: pollycat76 on Wednesday 30 June 21 12:23 BST (UK)
I should have said the cousins were on M's maternal side just to show those are in the "normal" cousin's range. I have checked M's shared matches with D and there are some 2nd to 3rd Cousins with Cms between 102 and 232 and the ones I have been able to trace back on the family tree are on D's maternal side.
Title: Re: Confusing Ancestry Results
Post by: Gadget on Wednesday 30 June 21 14:20 BST (UK)
I see. Are there any links to Ds paternal side?