RootsChat.Com

Scotland (Counties as in 1851-1901) => Scotland => Topic started by: ruthhelen on Tuesday 16 March 21 12:19 GMT (UK)

Title: Kirk session records have landed
Post by: ruthhelen on Tuesday 16 March 21 12:19 GMT (UK)
The wait is over:

https://www.scotlandspeople.gov.uk/virtual-volumes?fbclid=IwAR2nM4-vM6-LwNQek2Id1sFzZoWbdEE2pd6Nv_Ia-09mZf1lxDSRXzfzbtE

 ;D
Title: Re: Kirk session records have landed
Post by: dowdstree on Tuesday 16 March 21 12:27 GMT (UK)
Thank you ruthhelen.

That will keep many of us busy for a while.

Regards,

Dorrie
Title: Re: Kirk session records have landed
Post by: Forfarian on Tuesday 16 March 21 12:31 GMT (UK)
Great news.  :) :) :) :)

And the very last thing I need right now because I already have far too many things to do.  :(
Title: Re: Kirk session records have landed
Post by: ev on Tuesday 16 March 21 12:31 GMT (UK)
News release/background info. -
https://www.scotlandspeople.gov.uk/article/news-article-virtual-volumes-records-released

That's good news , thanks Ruthhelen  :)


ev
Title: Re: Kirk session records have landed
Post by: Gadget on Tuesday 16 March 21 13:18 GMT (UK)
Great news - thanks, Ruthhelen.

Will now go and explore with my card*  ;D

*Add - even better - only charged for downloads 8)
Title: Re: Kirk session records have landed
Post by: Jang on Wednesday 17 March 21 06:11 GMT (UK)
Thanks so much for posting this news!

In one of my previous posts: https://www.rootschat.com/forum/index.php?topic=817723.0
Forfarian suggested I check the Kirk Sessions for Dalkeith in 1835 to see if Jean Lamond was mentioned. I couldn't do that at the time (I'm in Australia) but today I was able to go straight to the case, which gave me all sorts of useful information about family relationships. There was no resolution in the Kirk Sessions but it became a Sheriff's Court Paternity case in 1837 by which time the alleged father had married and had two children. Looking forward to the time when those records come online :-)
Title: Re: Kirk session records have landed
Post by: kiwihalfpint on Wednesday 17 March 21 08:07 GMT (UK)
Thanks ruthhelen. :D

Something to do on a rainy day! 

Cheers
KHP
Title: Re: Kirk session records have landed
Post by: DonM on Sunday 21 March 21 21:42 GMT (UK)
Thank you for this.

I spent a couple of hours looking at parishes I have minor interest in and was not disappointed.   

The nice thing about having these is you are not wasting a ton of credits on maybes; its there right in front of you before you buy.  And then there is the bucket of coins saved on parking.

Don
Title: Re: Kirk session records have landed
Post by: Neale1961 on Sunday 21 March 21 22:07 GMT (UK)
I agree with DonM. I spent many hours over the wet weekend looking through New Abbey kirk sessions. Very fruitful and free! My eyes need some time to recover however.  :) The sister of my ancestor was summoned numerous times to be admonished and then pardoned for her illegitimate children - and now I know the names of the accused fathers.
Title: Re: Kirk session records have landed
Post by: mrcakey on Monday 22 March 21 10:01 GMT (UK)
Does anyone know if there'll be a volunteer-led indexing project to go alongside and if so, who's likely to organise it?
Title: Re: Kirk session records have landed
Post by: Gadget on Wednesday 09 June 21 23:52 BST (UK)
I've just been going through some of the Kirkmabreck minutes to see if I can find more about my Carsons and McCraes  but, so far, all they seem to record are fornications.

I'm not a novice in regard to Sessions records and know that this is one of the main concerns, but I've not read any before that is page after page of them without any light relief.

No mention of my ancestors so far!

Gadget
Title: Re: Kirk session records have landed
Post by: brigidmac on Thursday 10 June 21 00:25 BST (UK)
I saw that there was a section in SP. For kirk sessions but i couldnt understand HOW to use it

Theres an awful lot of reading about what CAN. Be found but as far as i could see you need to know the volume ref.of what you are looking for + it doesnt explain how to find it .

Could one of you kindly explain tbe steps i need to follow
For example if i want to find a paternity case between euphemia blane and david Kennedy ...how do i search
* Baby David Kennedy Blane born girvan AYR aug 1829
Title: Re: Kirk session records have landed
Post by: Gadget on Thursday 10 June 21 00:55 BST (UK)
Go to Kirk Session. Clck on Place Search - type in Girvan . Click on Girvan and  then click on Girvan kirk session.

However, you'll then find that the digitised minutes for Girvan are only available for 1848-1875
Title: Re: Kirk session records have landed
Post by: Rosinish on Thursday 10 June 21 01:52 BST (UK)
I've just found out something I didn't know before!!!  ::)...

You need to be signed into SP to access the link...

https://www.scotlandspeople.gov.uk/place-results?placename=barra&placetype%5B0%5D=all&record_type=pd_place_data

"Barra
A parish in the county of Ayr. It was a quoad omnia parish (a parish for civil and religious purposes). The island of Barra is in the Outer Hebrides, and the parish includes the surrounding islands. The parish was erected in 1733, when it was disjoined from South Uist."

I can't fathom how such an error could come about as Ayr is nothing like 'Inverness(-shire)" where Barra has always been (to my knowledge)  ???

Annie
Title: Re: Kirk session records have landed
Post by: ruthhelen on Thursday 10 June 21 06:47 BST (UK)
Looks like two entries have been merged there  ::)

Barr is a parish in the county of Ayr… not far from where I am, as it happens.

If you browse the A to Z list, the descriptions for Barr and Barra are next to each other  ;D

Ruth
Title: Re: Kirk session records have landed
Post by: Gadget on Thursday 10 June 21 08:21 BST (UK)
Not to be confused with the entry following:

Quote
Barra
An island in the Outer Hebrides and also a parish, in the county of Inverness. It was sometimes known as Barray. Do not confuse with the island of Burra (Shetland) and Burray (Orkney).

 :-X :-X :-X
Title: Re: Kirk session records have landed
Post by: brigidmac on Thursday 10 June 21 13:58 BST (UK)
Thanks for your explanation gadget
I.ll give it a go next time I'm on Scots research
Have another contested birth in similar era

Single woman
One man is named on birth certificate and the baby is given another man's first name ,+ surname as middle names .
I reckon the mother was hedging her bets but there may not have been a court case