RootsChat.Com

England (Counties as in 1851-1901) => England => Lancashire => Topic started by: gnorman on Friday 25 September 20 23:11 BST (UK)

Title: Bridget Logan Query
Post by: gnorman on Friday 25 September 20 23:11 BST (UK)
Hi everyone, thanks to some great help from other Rootschatters I have today recieved a death certificate for my relative, Thomas Logan. The certificate reads;

1870, St George's, Manchester. 18th April 1870, Thomas Logan of 8 Williamson Street, male, aged 44 years, tailor. Cause of death - Pulminary desease. Informant Bridget Logan, present at death & of 8 Williamson Street.

I have no idea who Bridget is or how they are related. Thomas' wife was Julia Logan.

Does anyone know where electors rolls would be held for this street - it doesnt seem to exist anymore or can anyone help with who Bridget may have been? Or is the a way of searching by address on the national census for 1871?

Many thanks, Luke
Title: Re: Bridget Logan Query
Post by: CaroleW on Saturday 26 September 20 00:42 BST (UK)
Quote
I have no idea who Bridget is or how they are related. Thomas' wife was Julia Logan.

So Bridget could be Thomas's unmarried sister or his sister in law if she married his brother.

Have you looked for her on the 1871 census?
Title: Re: Bridget Logan Query
Post by: louisa maud on Saturday 26 September 20 00:55 BST (UK)
1861 RG9/2933 FOLIO 95 PAGE 31 Manchester

Thomas 50 born Ireland Tailor D of B circa 1811
Julia 44 Ireland
Edward 14 Ireland
Onora 12
Margare t7
Ellen 4
Ann 2                     all siblings from Onora onwards  born Manchester

IF this is your Thomas he is way out on his age at death,

Julia appears to be on her own shown as "W" on 1871 age 60 but once again her age is out

Louisa Maud
Title: Re: Bridget Logan Query
Post by: CaroleW on Saturday 26 September 20 01:02 BST (UK)
In 1851 - Thomas is 29 & wife is shown as Judith 28

HO107 Piece 2226 Folio 73 Page 15

Any relationship shown for Bridget on the death cert?

Depends what you know about Thomas to link him to Bridget?
Title: Re: Bridget Logan Query
Post by: amondg on Saturday 26 September 20 03:52 BST (UK)
1871 census 33 Ashton (St.) Manchester

William Cooke Head 27 Iron Works Lab born Manchester
Ann wife 25 Cotton Weaver born Manchester
Julia Logan 60 widow boarder house keeper born Ireland

Daughter Ann Logan married William Cooke 17 November 1872 father Thomas Logan Tailor.

The Ann age 1 in 1851 the Ann age 2 in 1861 possibly daughter of Patsy
Title: Re: Bridget Logan Query
Post by: Dundee on Saturday 26 September 20 04:14 BST (UK)
Deleted, just having a brain snap.
Title: Re: Bridget Logan Query
Post by: CaroleW on Saturday 26 September 20 09:25 BST (UK)
Julia does not appear on the 1881 census.

There is no Julia Logan death or marriage in Manchester after 1871 so did she return to Ireland?

Could Bridget have travelled over from Ireland to visit the family hence her address being the same as theirs?

Without knowing more about Thomas it's impossible to say
Title: Re: Bridget Logan Query
Post by: louisa maud on Saturday 26 September 20 09:34 BST (UK)
1861                    and 1871  Manchester
Michael Logan 30        40
Bridget            26        36
Mary                 ?         14
William                        11
Matthew                        3
Parents born Ireland and children Manchester

Just trying to find the correct Bridget

Wonder what happened t all the Logan children on previous census


Louisa Maud
Title: Re: Bridget Logan Query
Post by: gnorman on Saturday 26 September 20 23:20 BST (UK)
Thank you all for your help.

Thomas' wife Julia died in Heywood in 1877. It does not say on the death certificate what relation Bridget was.

I cant find any other Bridget other than the one you mentioned Louisa Maud but its hard to confirm anything with so little info on the death cert.

I'm going to try to see if I can look at the electors roll to see if Julia is also at the address - if nothing else to prove to myself that this is the correct Thomas Logan (though i cant see any other Thomas Logans who are Tailors.

Thans everyone, Luke
Title: Re: Bridget Logan Query
Post by: louisa maud on Sunday 27 September 20 08:25 BST (UK)
Did anyone find who lived at that in 1871, I haven't got any CD's for Manchester, only London

LM
Title: Re: Bridget Logan Query
Post by: heywood on Sunday 27 September 20 09:51 BST (UK)
Did anyone find who lived at that in 1871, I haven't got any CD's for Manchester, only London

LM

1871 4047/160/37

John Kenny 36 Yrs
Mary Kenny 33 yrs
Mary Kenny 10 Yrs
Thomas Kenny 1 yr
Mary Brady 18 Yrs

No help there  :-\
Title: Re: Bridget Logan Query
Post by: louisa maud on Sunday 27 September 20 10:10 BST (UK)
No, so near yet so far as that was the address, ah well.
LM
Title: Re: Bridget Logan Query
Post by: jonwarrn on Sunday 27 September 20 11:05 BST (UK)
Have a rate book from 1869
Thos Logan at 8 Williamson Street
https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/3:1:S3HT-6P5V-CH
Title: Re: Bridget Logan Query
Post by: jonwarrn on Sunday 27 September 20 11:33 BST (UK)
Another Bridget
1871 census, Manchester
piece 4053 folio 25 page 16
piece 4053 folio 16 page 25
9 Parker Street
Bridget Logan Head Widow 30 Tailoress, born Ireland Galway
2 lodgers
https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:KDXM-QLH
Lozan on ancestry

Before Parker Street is King Street, and before that is Williamson Street, so literally just round the corner in St George, ED 32.
Title: Re: Bridget Logan Query
Post by: jonwarrn on Sunday 27 September 20 11:58 BST (UK)
Before Parker Street is King Street, and before that is Williamson Street, so literally just round the corner in St George, ED 32.

1871 seems to be the first year that Bridget Logan is at Parker Street in the rate books
Right down the bottom, at no. 9
https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/3:1:S3HT-6D9S-C1H

May or may not be the right Bridget!
Williamson Street is a few pages on
And here is Williamson in 1870
https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/3:1:S3HY-6DS9-PZ6

Title: Re: Bridget Logan Query
Post by: heywood on Sunday 27 September 20 12:20 BST (UK)
Is there an address for Bridget on that death certificate or is it just Thomas’ address.

I see she is a Tailoress and a widow. She might be a relative or a woman called upon when someone is dying/has died.
Title: Re: Bridget Logan Query
Post by: jonwarrn on Sunday 27 September 20 12:32 BST (UK)
1871 census
Bridget Logan Head Widow 30 Tailoress, born Ireland Galway
2 lodgers
https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:KDXM-QLH

Those lodgers are Catherine Avarty, 28, and Patrick Avarty, 2
There is a marriage in Manchester in 1874
Thomas Kelly and Bridget Logan / Bridget Haverty
Manchester Register Office or Registrar Attended (Lancashire BMD)
Could that be the same Bridget? :-\ Really don't know.
Title: Re: Bridget Logan Query
Post by: jonwarrn on Sunday 27 September 20 12:37 BST (UK)
On the other hand, 1875 rate book has a Bridget Logan in King Street (the one already mentioned)
https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/3:1:S3HT-6135-GZ

Enough of this Bridget Logan!

Title: Re: Bridget Logan Query
Post by: MaureeninNY on Sunday 27 September 20 14:55 BST (UK)
I think 8 Williamson St on the 1871 is this one:
Piece:4053/Folio   13/Page 20

Heywood may have spotted Williams Street??

Maureen
Title: Re: Bridget Logan Query
Post by: jonwarrn on Sunday 27 September 20 15:08 BST (UK)
Another Bridget
1871 census, Manchester
piece 4053 folio 25 page 16

I don't know if Maureen, or anyone, spotted my deliberate error
It is actually
piece 4053 folio 16 page 25

Wrong way round!
I will now correct it
Yes, Williamson Street is just a few census pages before, as I said.
John Ford, 35, a Hawker from County Galway there at 8
John
Title: Re: Bridget Logan Query
Post by: jonwarrn on Sunday 27 September 20 15:18 BST (UK)
In that enumeration district, number 32 in St George sub-dist, according to ancestry
784 persons
316 born in Ireland, a lot (but not all) have counties.
87 born in Co. Galway
Among Irish born heads it is 31/113 for Galway

Probably doesn't mean much, other than that the kindly enumerator did not cull the extra info :)
Title: Re: Bridget Logan Query
Post by: MaureeninNY on Sunday 27 September 20 16:00 BST (UK)
 :) :) John-I didn't notice your error.

I was too busy hoping that I had my folios and pages in the correct order.

Maureen
Title: Re: Bridget Logan Query
Post by: jonwarrn on Sunday 27 September 20 20:51 BST (UK)
I was too busy hoping that I had my folios and pages in the correct order.
;D

I was always a stickler for giving them, now I don't always bother, they are usually on the FamilySearch link, but not for the 1871 census.

I wondered about the origins of this query and have discovered that I apparently suggested the death certificate in question

Do you think I should go for Jonw65's suggestion - 'There's a death of another Thomas in 1870
June 1870 Manchester 8d 194, Logan, Thomas, age 44'

Now to read that thread again, to find out what it's all about! Memory not as good as it was...
John
Title: Re: Bridget Logan Query
Post by: jonwarrn on Sunday 27 September 20 21:11 BST (UK)
Those lodgers are Catherine Avarty, 28, and Patrick Avarty, 2

Both born Co Galway
Could then this be the birth of Patrick? :-\
Patt, mother Catherine Haverty
born 11 May 1868
Certificate
https://civilrecords.irishgenealogy.ie/churchrecords/images/birth_returns/births_1868/03426/2257246.pdf

Link to partial transcript on FamilySearch
https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:QL34-VXL6
Title: Re: Bridget Logan Query
Post by: jonwarrn on Sunday 27 September 20 23:04 BST (UK)
The district for Patt Haverty's birth was Mount Bellew
Place Gurteen..?

Now, back to
There is a marriage in Manchester in 1874
Thomas Kelly and Bridget Logan / Bridget Haverty
Manchester Register Office or Registrar Attended (Lancashire BMD)

I do find that a bit of a coincidence, and the 1871 census does say that Bridget Logan in Parker Street, Manchester, was a widow.
After a bit of a struggle, a possible marriage in Ireland?
9 August 1862
Thomas Loghan + Bridget Haverty

Witnesses Timothy Haverty, Catherine Haverty.
Bridget transcribed as Baverty
Marriage was at Moylough in Galway, alternative parish name Mountbellew :)
(Info from findmypast)

Image here
https://registers.nli.ie//registers/vtls000632069#page/26/mode/1up

can anyone help with who Bridget may have been?

Are there any thoughts  from Luke on the Bridget (or Bridgets!) uncovered today?
Could Thomas (Loghan) in Mountbellew have been a relation of Thomas the tailor in Manchester? :-\
Title: Re: Bridget Logan Query
Post by: jonwarrn on Monday 28 September 20 10:27 BST (UK)
I mentioned Bridget Logan being listed in the rate book at King Street in 1875, though there was a a possible marriage to James Kelly in '74
Here she is, at number 17
https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/3:1:S3HT-6135-GZ

Now in 1876, who do you think is listed at 17 King St? James Kelly
https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/3:1:S3HY-65QD-22

Looks like they just were a bit behind in updating things.
So hopefully we can follow Bridget Logan nee Haverty from at least 1871 in Parker Street through to being in King Street and then marrying James Kelly.
And likely back to that marriage in Galway in 1862?
Then to Manchester and to 8 Williamson Street?

Could Thomas (Loghan) in Mountbellew have been a relation of Thomas the tailor in Manchester?

They might of course be the same person? :-\
Bridget the informant being his wife. Who then moves but a short distance to Parker St, where she is joined by her relative (sister?) Catherine Haverty.
Thomas would have been a bit older than Bridget, but so what?
That the two Thomas Logans in Manchester were both tailors could just be coincidence.
Title: Re: Bridget Logan Query
Post by: louisa maud on Monday 28 September 20 10:34 BST (UK)
Jonw65
Think  I will name you super sleuth

Louisa Maud
Title: Re: Bridget Logan Query
Post by: jonwarrn on Monday 28 September 20 10:41 BST (UK)
Hi LM
It's very nice of you, but perhaps super dunce would be better.
Bridget Logan/Haverty married Thomas Kelly in 1874, not James :(
 
Though you never know, they might have got the name wrong in the rate book!
And of course the rest could still hold up. It seems quite likely it was that same Bridget who married Mr Kelly.

But it doesn't help Luke with the death cert. It may be his Thomas, who was a tailor, but as you said, LM, age is well out.   
And we don't know he lived in that particular area.  We do know that the Bridget discussed did, and she may well have been the widow of a different Thomas. 
Oh dear!
John             
Title: Re: Bridget Logan Query
Post by: gnorman on Monday 28 September 20 11:51 BST (UK)
Thank you all for such hard work and such great detective work. In my heart I was obviously hoping to solve this all and prove this Thomas to be the correct one but the evidence isnt really going that way at the moment. I am going to contact the Manchester Library to see what the electors books say just incase. I will keep you informed if I get anywhere.
I really appreciate all of this help, thanks,
Luke
Title: Re: Bridget Logan Query
Post by: louisa maud on Monday 28 September 20 12:15 BST (UK)
Good luck Luke

Happy hunting

Louisa Maud
Title: Re: Bridget Logan Query
Post by: gnorman on Monday 28 September 20 13:19 BST (UK)
I have emailed the Manchester Library but have been thinking, finding Thomas' grave may give more information. Is Philips Park the most possible location do you think?
Title: Re: Bridget Logan Query
Post by: BumbleB on Monday 28 September 20 13:27 BST (UK)
There is no entry in 1870 for Thomas Logan being buried in these cemeteries:

https://www.burialrecords.manchester.gov.uk/
Title: Re: Bridget Logan Query
Post by: jonwarrn on Monday 28 September 20 13:43 BST (UK)
Was he in West Gorton (Belle Vue) prison for a short spell in 1863?
No. 21118
Thomas Logan
Drunk + Riotous
14 days
Age 46
Tailor, born Ireland, wife Julia
Blind in one eye

Two images starting here
https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/3:1:S3HY-6169-1MB
Title: Re: Bridget Logan Query
Post by: louisa maud on Monday 28 September 20 13:48 BST (UK)
Wow  jonw65
Title: Re: Bridget Logan Query
Post by: gnorman on Monday 28 September 20 16:23 BST (UK)
Great find JonW65, it seems another of my relatives had a brush with the law, it seems everyone I find had a brush or two.
Thanks, Luke
Title: Re: Bridget Logan Query
Post by: louisa maud on Monday 28 September 20 16:35 BST (UK)
Makes it interesting,  I have bigamists plus a thief,  not on my side I hasten to add on my husbands

LM