RootsChat.Com

General => The Common Room => Topic started by: gratuation on Monday 25 November 19 14:24 GMT (UK)

Title: Age a women could marry in 1750
Post by: gratuation on Monday 25 November 19 14:24 GMT (UK)
Hi, I wonder if anyone can help me with this query . I hadn’t taken much notice of my ancestors age of marriage until now, but when I worked it out she was only 13 . This can’t be correct can it ? She was born in 1742 married in 1755 . Any help appreciated
G
Title: Re: Age a women could marry in 1750
Post by: stanmapstone on Monday 25 November 19 14:31 GMT (UK)
The legal age for marriage was 12 for girls and 14 for boys until the 1929 Age of Marriage Act which made all marriages carried out from 10 May 1929, void if either partner was under the age of 16.

Stan
Title: Re: Age a women could marry in 1750
Post by: gratuation on Monday 25 November 19 14:46 GMT (UK)
Thank you Stan , oh my goodness that’s quite shocking . I thought I must have had the wrong marriage entry .
Many thanks
G
Title: Re: Age a women could marry in 1750
Post by: Alexander. on Monday 25 November 19 15:34 GMT (UK)
It is my understanding that although not illegal, marriages at such a young age were extremely rare. I think you probably have the wrong birth or marriage record.

Alexander
Title: Re: Age a women could marry in 1750
Post by: River Tyne Lass on Monday 25 November 19 15:42 GMT (UK)
Apparently, the age of consent from 13 to 16 was brought about after the capaigning work of William Thomas Stead.   He later died on the Titanic.

Shocking that this was so young!

https://www.rootschat.com/forum/index.php?topic=808226.54

I mentioned him on a Totally Off Topic thread - post 58 on 'Volume 15 of the Good Read Thread'.  He was quite an amazing and heroic man.
Title: Re: Age a women could marry in 1750
Post by: Guy Etchells on Monday 25 November 19 15:50 GMT (UK)
It is my understanding that although not illegal, marriages at such a young age were extremely rare. I think you probably have the wrong birth or marriage record.

Alexander

The extremely rare marriages were those of children under 7 years old which were in reality more betrothals rather than what we would term a marriage. Marriage between 12 and 16 though not common did happen, so don't dismiss them out of hand, just treat with caution.
One mistake is to confuse a baptism with a birth,
Cheers
Guy
Title: Re: Age a women could marry in 1750
Post by: stanmapstone on Monday 25 November 19 15:58 GMT (UK)
Just to add that the legal age for marriage remained at 14 for boys and 12 for girls in the Republic of Ireland, until 1st January 1975, when it was raised to 16.
From time immemorial the age for matrimonial consent was fixed at 7 years, but puberty was accepted as the age for consummation of the marriage, which was 12 for girls and 14 for boys.
In England and Wales the figures for marriage below the age of 16 from 1846 to when the 1929 Act came into effect are only 35 males and 1,844 females.
Stan
Title: Re: Age a women could marry in 1750
Post by: ThrelfallYorky on Monday 25 November 19 17:20 GMT (UK)
And don't forget, quite a lot of people - not just Baptists - were baptised quite a few years after birth, which can add to confusion.
Title: Re: Age a women could marry in 1750
Post by: chris_49 on Monday 25 November 19 19:12 GMT (UK)
This thread:

https://www.rootschat.com/forum/index.php?topic=779104.0

recounts an instance of a 14-year old marrying as late as 1926, which had many (including me) disbelieving.

And she wasn't even pregnant - there's posh for you!
Title: Re: Age a women could marry in 1750
Post by: Redroger on Tuesday 26 November 19 14:42 GMT (UK)
Thank you Stan , oh my goodness that’s quite shocking . I thought I must have had the wrong marriage entry .
Many thanks
G
[/quote
Don't make the mistake of judging the 18th century or earlier by today's standards. Remember that at that time life expectancy was only in the 30s. If you waited to marry you could well be dead!
Title: Re: Age a women could marry in 1750
Post by: GrahamSimons on Tuesday 26 November 19 17:03 GMT (UK)
My 3-greats grandmother was 12 or 13 when she married my 3-greats grandfather who was 49 at the time (1779).
Title: Re: Age a women could marry in 1750
Post by: gratuation on Tuesday 26 November 19 18:36 GMT (UK)
I’ll know in future it was quite normal back then and thanks everyone
Title: Re: Age a women could marry in 1750
Post by: melba_schmelba on Tuesday 26 November 19 19:47 GMT (UK)
I’ll know in future it was quite normal back then and thanks everyone
I definitely wouldn't say that. In my trees of several thousand people, I have never found a marriage at that age, going back to the 1500s. The youngest I have seen is 14, and there was only one of those.
Title: Re: Age a women could marry in 1750
Post by: stanmapstone on Tuesday 26 November 19 21:41 GMT (UK)
From "The Oxford Guide to Family History" by David Hey.
Another myth that has been firmly laid to rest by social historians is that English people used to marry when they were very young......The evidence is inconclusive for the medieval period, but the study of parish registers has left no doubt that since the sixteenth century at least England has shared the north-western European pattern of a later age at marriage.... So well established was this pattern by the beginnings of parish registration, that it is unlikely that medieval experience was much different.... Only a very small proportion of the population of Elizabethan England married before the age of 20.

Stan
Title: Re: Age a women could marry in 1750
Post by: gratuation on Tuesday 26 November 19 22:20 GMT (UK)
Thanks for the information