RootsChat.Com
England (Counties as in 1851-1901) => Worcestershire => England => Worcestershire Lookup Requests => Topic started by: jeanburton on Wednesday 10 August 05 18:53 BST (UK)
-
Would someone kindley look for info. Re:- William Banastre
c 1665 at St Thomas Dudley. He married Mary Cotterill 1705 at St thomas.
I believe his parents where Humphry and Mary
Any help would be appreciated as I live in Scotland now and it is along way to travel
Thanks Jean
-
I think I may be descended from this couple via their daughter Elizabeth. Can you tell me where you found this marriage?
-
FreeREG has;
Marriage;
09 Jun 1701, St Thomas, Dudley
William BANNISTER to Mary COTTERILL
William a Collier
Bapts there also;
JOHN 31 May 1702
JOSEPH 19 Mar 1703/4
Parents WILLIAM/MARY, Father a Collier
All as BANNISTER
+
ELIZABETH Banister 06 Oct 1706, to William/Mary, Father a Glover**
Other children with William as a Glover;
MARY Banister 01 Jan 1708/9
SARAH Banester 06 May 1711
HANNAH Banister 30 May 1714
+
To William/Mary, all as Bannister
ESTHER 08 Dec 1717
JOHN 20 Mar 1719/20
JOSEPH 03 Apr 1720
SARAH 26 Mar 1722
These all have no occp for William.
Looks like 2 couples named William/Mary to me, unlikely a Collier would become a Glover.
Also a Burial of EDWARD Banister, 10 Jan 1707/8 son of William
Trish :)
-
William Banaster baptised 29 October 1665 Dudley, father Humphrey according to familysearch
-
+
HUMPHRY Banister bapt 20 Jan 1672/3 to HUMPHRY and MARGRETT
8 children 1663-1684, most with Mother as Margaret/Magrett etc and some as Mary
+
Humphery BANISTER Buried 5 May 1710, occp Skinner
+
MARGRETT wife of Humphrey Banister buried 14 Jan 1677/8
So he may have remarried to a Mary?
-
Thank you, I had looked on FreeReg but missed these for some reason.
I am descended from Elizabeth so from William the Glover.
I think it is William the Collier who probably married Mary Cotterill going by the dates of birth of the children (ie a year after the wedding), so Mary Cotterill could be a red herring as far as I am concerned.
-
I always search with the soundex on FreeREG as there are variations in surname spellings :)