RootsChat.Com

England (Counties as in 1851-1901) => England => Northumberland => Topic started by: heathera1940 on Monday 10 September 18 12:49 BST (UK)

Title: James Hastie Unthank
Post by: heathera1940 on Monday 10 September 18 12:49 BST (UK)
My Aunt Mary Dixon Hastie b. 1895 in Berwick on Tweed married James Alexander Unthank B 1891 in Berwick . They had a son James Hastie Unthank b. 1912 in Berwick. I have found his birth but cannot trace anything after that. I know the family moved at some point to the Hull area. any info on James much appreciated. Thanks Heather
Title: Re: Unthank
Post by: heywood on Monday 10 September 18 13:34 BST (UK)
Hello,

Published trees show james Unthank marrying Grace Eleanor Carroll, 1933, Stockton. September 10a pg 153
No middle name is shown though and one mentions mother as Hastie.

Heywood

Title: Re: Unthank
Post by: KGarrad on Monday 10 September 18 14:22 BST (UK)
1939 National Register is showing a James Unthank, born 1892, Single, Smallware Pedlar at 10 Ryland Avenue, Kingston-upon-Hull.

That could be the father?
Title: Re: Unthank
Post by: Jebber on Monday 10 September 18 14:31 BST (UK)
There is a death for Mary UNTHANK  age 40 in Hull in 1935.
Title: Re: Unthank
Post by: Jebber on Monday 10 September 18 14:34 BST (UK)
James junior would have been of an age for call up for WW2, so unlikely to show up in the 1939 Register.
Title: Re: Unthank
Post by: heywood on Monday 10 September 18 15:08 BST (UK)
James junior would have been of an age for call up for WW2, so unlikely to show up in the 1939 Register.

If the tree is correct, although no verification is shown, James died ‘about 1942’. His wife did remarry.
I can't see a death so perhaps, if it is him, the death was due to WW2.
Nothing in CWGC record though.
Title: Re: Unthank
Post by: JenB on Monday 10 September 18 15:25 BST (UK)
Is this the same family? It says the father was a W. Unthank  :-\

However William Paxton Unthank (born 1 q. 1911) and James Hastie Unthank both shared mother's maiden name Hastie  :-\

If it is the right James this means he was still alive in 1945. Article from Berwick Advertiser 24 May 1945

Edit: ignore this posting and the next one - it's a different family (see reply #8)
Title: Re: Unthank
Post by: JenB on Monday 10 September 18 15:45 BST (UK)
Is this the same family? It says the father was a W. Unthank  :-\

However William Paxton Unthank (born 1 q. 1911) and James Hastie Unthank both shared mother's maiden name Hastie  :-\


William Paxton Unthank is in the same household as James and Mary in 1911
Title: Re: Unthank
Post by: MaureeninNY on Monday 10 September 18 15:49 BST (UK)
I think the chaps from the newspaper article were born in the 1920's-mmn Davidson.

William P UNTHANK married an Annie DAVIDSON 1910?

Maureen
Title: Re: Unthank
Post by: JenB on Monday 10 September 18 16:18 BST (UK)
I think the chaps from the newspaper article were born in the 1920's-mmn Davidson.

William P UNTHANK married an Annie DAVIDSON 1910?

Maureen

Yes, you're quite right. For a moment I thought I was onto something there.
Title: Re: Unthank
Post by: MaureeninNY on Monday 10 September 18 16:28 BST (UK)
I think the chaps from the newspaper article were born in the 1920's-mmn Davidson.

William P UNTHANK married an Annie DAVIDSON 1910?

Maureen

Yes, you're quite right. For a moment I thought I was onto something there.

So did I! ;)

Maureen
Title: Re: Unthank
Post by: JenB on Monday 10 September 18 16:51 BST (UK)
Also born to the Unthank/Hastie marriage (just for the record)

William Paxton (1911)
Margaret Hastie (1914)

Title: Re: Unthank
Post by: JenB on Monday 10 September 18 17:04 BST (UK)
I know the family moved at some point to the Hull area. any info on James much appreciated.

In this thread you say the family moved to Whitby  :-\ http://www.rootschat.com/forum/index.php?topic=306600.msg1880296#msg1880296
Title: Re: Unthank
Post by: JenB on Monday 10 September 18 18:06 BST (UK)
James Unthank, born 1892, Single, Smallware Pedlar at 10 Ryland Avenue, Kingston-upon-Hull.

That could be the father?

That would fit with the 1911 census in Berwick on Tweed, with Mary (Hastie) and William Paxton, where he is aged 19.

Title: Re: Unthank
Post by: heywood on Monday 10 September 18 18:39 BST (UK)
If the trees I mentioned have the right James Unthank marrying Grace, there is a newspaper snippet from 1944, mentioning her husband's desertion - Hartlepool Northern Daily Mail.
Title: Re: Unthank
Post by: JenB on Monday 10 September 18 18:55 BST (UK)
Not that it's any help finding James (if indeed it is the right James) but doing a free search on the 1939 register index on FindMyPast I think Grace might be wrongly indexed as Joyce E Isley (Muthank) on Stockton. She is in the Carroll household which would fit in with her maiden name.

Added: they are living in Beaconsfield Road which fits with the newspaper article.
Title: Re: James Hastie Unthank
Post by: heathera1940 on Monday 10 September 18 22:17 BST (UK)
Many thanks for all the info.  I will look into it all.  It is like a jigsaw puzzle
Thanks Heather
Title: Re: James Hastie Unthank
Post by: heathera1940 on Tuesday 11 September 18 12:45 BST (UK)
The boys mentioned in the newspaper article are the sons of William Paxton Unthank and Annie Davidson. William is the brother of James Alexander Unthank who is the father of the James Hastie Unthank born 1912 that I am looking for. James H could have been in World War 2  so his whereabouts could be difficult to find. I might have to get the marriage certificate for the James and Grace marriage in 1933.
Cheers Heather.
Title: Re: James Hastie Unthank
Post by: D.Jackson on Sunday 17 September 23 19:09 BST (UK)
Hello All
Try this
William Paxton Unthank (Grandfather B1854 - D1916) had numerous children
One son, William Unthank (B1888 - D1970) married Anne Davidson in 1910, they had a son named William Paxton Unthank in 1911, but he died shortly after birth.
Another son James Unthank (B1892 - D?) married Mary Hastie in 1910, had 3 sons and a daughter. Eldest son named William Paxton Unthank (again) B1911 - D2002
Hence I believe the newspaper article has the sons attributed to the wrong brother.