RootsChat.Com
Beginners => Family History Beginners Board => Topic started by: momtoss on Saturday 31 March 18 20:26 BST (UK)
-
Some information from 1891 census.
Number 47, Godfrey Street, Chelsea, London
WIDLEY Robert, Head, Marr, 30, Boot maker, Kensington, London
Mary A, Wife, Marr, 29, Dorking, London
Edith R, Dau, Unm, 7, Chelsea
Robert A, Son, Unm, 3, Chelsea
Frances M, Dau, Unm, 1, Chelsea
**George was born after Frances...and there was one more sibling I believe.
If you are a relative....please post below.
-
Hi
Welcome to Rootschat!
I am not family.
I found the following births, all Chelsea,
WIDLEY with mother's maiden name of HEMENS/HEMMENS/FLEMENS . . . . .
1883 EDITH ROSE
1887 ROBERT ALBERT
1890 FRANCES MAY
1892 ALICE MAUD (d 1894)
1893 HARRY
1896 GEORGE EDWARD
1899 MARY
1903 FREDERICK WILLIAM
Ray
-
Thank you Ray for the additional information! :)
-
According to the 1911 Removed So Ray seems to have found too many children.
Moderator comment: 1911 census details removed. You may only post the results from free search, fertility information is not freely available
-
Hmm, not sure what to think here.
The 1901 has the following children listed:-
Frances (1889), Harry (1894), George (1897), Mary (1899) and Robert (1888). Robert seems to have been listed last on the image for some reason.
Surname transcribed as Whidley on Find My Past.
-
There was a lot of confusion surrounding the 1911 census as this was the first to be filled in by the occupant.
I think he's misread it & just put the 4 still at home + the one that died instead of including all of them.
-
Yes, that's probably it Jim. I found that with a family I was researching. One more child than I was expecting, searched the births umpteen times and came to the conclusion that they had included a still born child.
-
I appreciate all the help! Thank you so much!