RootsChat.Com

Old Photographs, Recognition, Handwriting Deciphering => Handwriting Deciphering & Recognition => Topic started by: IowaToni on Wednesday 13 December 17 18:15 GMT (UK)

Title: wedding guest 1834 Tryon
Post by: IowaToni on Wednesday 13 December 17 18:15 GMT (UK)
I can't make out Elizabeth's last name. I've tried Newsom and Nelder. I've made a tree for each Elizabeth with that last name but I can't find the link between her and John Clark and Phoebe Clark Ward and/or William Weeks.

If I could be sure that Phoebe's parents were Ebenezer Ward and Peggy Margaret Clark it would help. I was hoping this Elizabeth could shed some light on that.

The original entry is at family search right hand side on the bottom.
https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/3:1:33S7-81SM-ZTL?i=34&wc=M6PH-YP6%3A238490601%2C238528001%2C238493402%2C238528002&cc=1937794
Title: Re: wedding guest 1834 Tryon
Post by: Hephzibah on Wednesday 13 December 17 18:22 GMT (UK)
Newham?
Title: Re: wedding guest 1834 Tryon
Post by: Rhododendron on Wednesday 13 December 17 18:24 GMT (UK)
I agree with Newham.
Title: Re: wedding guest 1834 Tryon
Post by: ScobieDrom on Wednesday 13 December 17 18:28 GMT (UK)
I agree Newham
Title: Re: wedding guest 1834 Tryon
Post by: arthurk on Wednesday 13 December 17 19:31 GMT (UK)
I think the 4th letter is like the 's' in house and presence - see the first and last words of the third line.

This gives Newsam, though there are no doubt variants of this: you mentioned Newsom, but maybe also Newsome and Newsham.
Title: Re: wedding guest 1834 Tryon
Post by: IowaToni on Wednesday 13 December 17 22:00 GMT (UK)
Yes, those are all names I've tried. And the 1841 census didn't help! I have no doubt in my mind this guest is related to my Ward family since All of them are hiding from me so successfully. It's amazing that there isn't a family tree on ancestry that matches any of them.
Title: Re: wedding guest 1834 Tryon
Post by: Ruskie on Wednesday 13 December 17 22:49 GMT (UK)
I originally thought Newham before reading other replies, but looking more closely, the middle letter looks a bit closer to the 's' in 'presence' rather than the 'h' in 'others' in the same entry.

There is no guarantee that Elizabeth is related to the family - she may be a friend of the bride for example.  :-\ Not every tree is on Ancestry so I'm not sure why you are surprised you have found no matches to this family.  ;)

PS. Welcome to rootschat.
Title: Re: wedding guest 1834 Tryon
Post by: Treetotal on Wednesday 13 December 17 23:09 GMT (UK)
The "s" in presence appears closed to me so I  ewham.
Carol