RootsChat.Com

Old Photographs, Recognition, Handwriting Deciphering => Handwriting Deciphering & Recognition => Topic started by: liamcornes1983 on Monday 27 November 17 12:41 GMT (UK)

Title: Metropolitan police division code decipher
Post by: liamcornes1983 on Monday 27 November 17 12:41 GMT (UK)
Hi all can anyone decipher the division number next to the date of 15/12/1920 please. Would anyone know what division this was? Many thanks.
Title: Re: Metropolitan police division code decipher
Post by: C-A on Monday 27 November 17 16:21 GMT (UK)
Looks like CU.C.I to me (possibly 6U.C.I)

Not sure if you have already seen this, but on the National Archives site there is a list of letters used for the various divisions (unfortunately it doesn't include anything the seems to fit, but maybe if you have a look there will be something that would make sense to you? http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/help-with-your-research/research-guides/london-metropolitan-police/
Title: Re: Metropolitan police division code decipher
Post by: liamcornes1983 on Monday 27 November 17 16:25 GMT (UK)
Looks like CU.C.I to me (possibly 6U.C.I)

Not sure if you have already seen this, but on the National Archives site there is a list of letters used for the various divisions (unfortunately it doesn't include anything the seems to fit, but maybe if you have a look there will be something that would make sense to you? http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/help-with-your-research/research-guides/london-metropolitan-police/

Thanks C-A
Title: Re: Metropolitan police division code decipher
Post by: purlin on Monday 27 November 17 17:13 GMT (UK)
Could it be E division, in which case it would have been Holborn.
Title: Re: Metropolitan police division code decipher
Post by: mazi on Monday 27 November 17 18:10 GMT (UK)
Pure guess, but could it be CU for custody unit, after 20 years service it was not unusual to be promoted to a less demanding job, also enhanced the pension and gratuity


Mike
Title: Re: Metropolitan police division code decipher
Post by: liamcornes1983 on Tuesday 28 November 17 11:41 GMT (UK)
Pure guess, but could it be CU for custody unit, after 20 years service it was not unusual to be promoted to a less demanding job, also enhanced the pension and gratuity


Mike

Thanks Mike, he became a Divisional Detective Inspector afterwards, until he resigned from C. I. D. @ Bow Street on 25/09/25
Title: Re: Metropolitan police division code decipher
Post by: liamcornes1983 on Tuesday 28 November 17 11:43 GMT (UK)
Pure guess, but could it be CU for custody unit, after 20 years service it was not unusual to be promoted to a less demanding job, also enhanced the pension and gratuity


Mike

Thanks Mike, he became a Divisional Detective Inspector afterwards, until he resigned from C. I. D. @ Bow Street on 25/09/25

Mike, here is more about his postings.
Title: Re: Metropolitan police division code decipher
Post by: C-A on Tuesday 28 November 17 11:47 GMT (UK)
CU could also be Command Unit ... used today I believe
Title: Re: Metropolitan police division code decipher
Post by: liamcornes1983 on Tuesday 28 November 17 13:05 GMT (UK)
CU could also be Command Unit ... used today I believe

Thanks C-A, I get in touch with the Met and find out.
Title: Re: Metropolitan police division code decipher
Post by: liamcornes1983 on Wednesday 06 December 17 09:07 GMT (UK)
Hi all recieved a reply from Metropolitan Police Heritage Centre, it's CV-C1 which is the Public Carriage Office: Central Vehicles.

Liam
Title: Re: Metropolitan police division code decipher
Post by: C-A on Wednesday 06 December 17 09:34 GMT (UK)
Ha!  All wrong then ...good to know, thanks  :)
Title: Re: Metropolitan police division code decipher
Post by: mazi on Wednesday 06 December 17 09:48 GMT (UK)
That’ll teach me not to guess  ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

Mike
Title: Re: Metropolitan police division code decipher
Post by: JGDavies on Sunday 10 December 17 18:36 GMT (UK)
For a similar query (J - Bethnal Green) checking the electoral roll for the area concerned showed the PC in question living in a local Station House. Might be worth a try.