RootsChat.Com

England (Counties as in 1851-1901) => England => Lancashire => Topic started by: tucson mike on Sunday 26 March 17 00:30 GMT (UK)

Title: 1936 birth location in Liverpool
Post by: tucson mike on Sunday 26 March 17 00:30 GMT (UK)
I have a cert for someone born August 8, 1936 in Liverpool. The "where born" column says 104 Rice Lane. The mother's address is 47 Scourfield St. which isn't nearby. Is there a directory where I might discover who or what was at the birth address 81 years ago?
Title: Re: 1936 birth location in Liverpool
Post by: gortonboy on Sunday 26 March 17 00:39 GMT (UK)
Can you post the surname of the person born ?
Title: Re: 1936 birth location in Liverpool
Post by: tucson mike on Sunday 26 March 17 02:05 BST (UK)
Normal Stokes born to Alice Stokes, father's name not given, says "adopted* at right of cert.
Title: Re: 1936 birth location in Liverpool
Post by: gortonboy on Sunday 26 March 17 02:18 BST (UK)
Searched the 1939 register. Nobody of that surname there then. Hopefully someone from Liverpool can search the electoral roll for that year for you next time they are at the main library.
Title: Re: 1936 birth location in Liverpool
Post by: gortonboy on Sunday 26 March 17 02:18 BST (UK)
Deleted......posted twice.
Title: Re: 1936 birth location in Liverpool
Post by: tucson mike on Sunday 26 March 17 02:54 BST (UK)
Thank you for checking the Register. I do not know that the birth address was a residence, though. That's why I was hoping to find an old map or street directory of some sort, for an address-based lookup. I have a marriage cert where a street address is a hospital but the hospital name isn't in the cert.
Title: Re: 1936 birth location in Liverpool
Post by: gortonboy on Sunday 26 March 17 02:55 BST (UK)
Seemed to be an ordinary family home in 1939.
Title: Re: 1936 birth location in Liverpool
Post by: tucson mike on Sunday 26 March 17 02:58 BST (UK)
OK, that's helpful. Thanks!
Title: Re: 1936 birth location in Liverpool
Post by: gortonboy on Sunday 26 March 17 04:01 BST (UK)
There was a workhouse on Rice Lane,,,it then became known as WAlton institute,,,then Walton hospital. Interestingly.....in 1904 the registrar general decided that if you were born in the workhouse,,,you no longer had to put this on the birth certificate,,,and you could instead put an ordinary street address,,or an invented one. Many workhouses used just one address for this purpose....so instead of saying on your birth certificate you were born in the workhouse,,,it would give the address. West Derby which covers the area you are interested in used this address on Workhouse birth certificates....107a Rice Lane. I think the workhouse had ceased to exist by 1936.. But maybe he was born in the institute or hospital...and they used a simalar address,,,just a thought.
Title: Re: 1936 birth location in Liverpool
Post by: gortonboy on Sunday 26 March 17 04:06 BST (UK)

Walton Hospital started life as a West Derby Poor Law Institution in 1868. It was at first a workhouse providing facilities for healthy as well as sick inmates. During the early twentieth century it expanded its role as a hospital. From 1913 it was no longer known as a workhouse, being known as the Walton Institution. After the abolition of the Poor Law Guardians in 1930 it changed its name once more to Walton Hospital and no longer had responsibilities for the healthy poor. The hospital became part of the National Health Service in 1948 and became particularly known for its treatment of neurological problems. The hospital closed in 1994.
Title: Re: 1936 birth location in Liverpool
Post by: gortonboy on Sunday 26 March 17 04:09 BST (UK)
So maybe he was born in Walton hospital?
Title: Re: 1936 birth location in Liverpool
Post by: tucson mike on Sunday 26 March 17 04:27 BST (UK)
Yes, all that fits. I found an earlier thread on this topic at:

http://www.rootschat.com/forum/index.php?topic=10252.msg6026123#msg6026123

and an article at:
https://historicengland.org.uk/services-skills/education/educational-images/walton-hospital-rice-lane-liverpool-359311

Thanks!
Title: Re: 1936 birth location in Liverpool
Post by: garstonite on Sunday 26 March 17 09:24 BST (UK)
quite a strange situation - Scourfield St is the area close to Edge Hill station - a mile away from Sefton General Hospital - where both my sons were born - I am in Garston 4 miles from Scourfield st - so why would a lady go to Walton Neurological Hospital to give birth ??..about 8 miles away from Scourfield st - the only reason I can think of is that maybe Alice had an accident and suffered a head injury and that was why she was in Walton ??...do you know when Alice Stokes died ??
Title: Re: 1936 birth location in Liverpool
Post by: ShaunJ on Sunday 26 March 17 11:38 BST (UK)
There was a maternity ward at Walton Hospital. Paul McCartney was born there.
Title: Re: 1936 birth location in Liverpool
Post by: Blue70 on Sunday 26 March 17 16:35 BST (UK)
How long after birth was the child adopted? I'm wondering if the mother went to court for maintenance money from the father. The year 1936 is within the available years for Liverpool's Affiliation Registers. Here is a link to my experience using these records:-

https://www.liverpool-genealogy.org.uk/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=24&t=15642


Blue
Title: Re: 1936 birth location in Liverpool
Post by: Blue70 on Sunday 26 March 17 16:44 BST (UK)
Are you sure it is a 4 and not a 7? Could it be the handwriting? As people have said Walton Hospital was 107 Rice Lane.


Blue
Title: Re: 1936 birth location in Liverpool
Post by: tucson mike on Sunday 26 March 17 16:52 BST (UK)
107 Rice Lane is what it says. The 7 has some curlicues & I mistook it for a 4. Sorry.
Title: Re: 1936 birth location in Liverpool
Post by: Blue70 on Sunday 26 March 17 16:59 BST (UK)
107 Rice Lane is what it says. The 7 has some curlicues & I mistook it for a 4. Sorry.

It's easily done Mike it happens to all of us.


Blue 
Title: Re: 1936 birth location in Liverpool
Post by: Blue70 on Sunday 26 March 17 17:01 BST (UK)
I've had a look at one of my certificates there won't be a date of adoption on that birth certificate. The date of adoption will be on the GRO Adoption Certificate.


Blue
Title: Re: 1936 birth location in Liverpool
Post by: tucson mike on Sunday 26 March 17 17:08 BST (UK)
How long after birth was the child adopted?


Yes, the adoption part is a separate puzzle. I just received a copy of the birth cert I ordered from the GRO. "Adopted" is in the same handwriting as the rest of the information. The child was born on the 8th and the birth registered on the 22nd of August 1936. So the adoption seems to have been arranged before the birth was recorded. Since the father's name is not given, perhaps Walton Hospital arranged the adoption. 
Title: Re: 1936 birth location in Liverpool
Post by: tucson mike on Sunday 26 March 17 17:25 BST (UK)
The bigger picture here is that I have a DNA match with a woman living in greater Liverpool. We believe her grandfather was my uncle James. He married a Sarah Stokes but had mental problems already when they married, and was eventually put away. I was hoping this birth cert would list Sarah, not Alice, as the mother. Given the oddity of omitting the name of the hospital, though, I'm wondering how accurate the rest of the cert is!

I will look for adoption records and other birth records next. The RootsChat community is great. Thanks for your help!
Title: Re: 1936 birth location in Liverpool
Post by: tucson mike on Sunday 26 March 17 17:30 BST (UK)
There was a workhouse on Rice Lane,,,it then became known as WAlton institute,,,then Walton hospital. Interestingly.....in 1904 the registrar general decided that if you were born in the workhouse,,,you no longer had to put this on the birth certificate,,,and you could instead put an ordinary street address,,or an invented one. Many workhouses used just one address for this purpose....so instead of saying on your birth certificate you were born in the workhouse,,,it would give the address. West Derby which covers the area you are interested in used this address on Workhouse birth certificates....107a Rice Lane. I think the workhouse had ceased to exist by 1936.. But maybe he was born in the institute or hospital...and they used a simalar address,,,just a thought.


Yes, that's helpful. The practice probably continued after the reason for it disappeared.
Title: Re: 1936 birth location in Liverpool
Post by: tucson mike on Sunday 26 March 17 17:38 BST (UK)
quite a strange situation - Scourfield St is the area close to Edge Hill station - a mile away from Sefton General Hospital - where both my sons were born - I am in Garston 4 miles from Scourfield st - so why would a lady go to Walton Neurological Hospital to give birth ??..about 8 miles away from Scourfield st - the only reason I can think of is that maybe Alice had an accident and suffered a head injury and that was why she was in Walton ??...do you know when Alice Stokes died ??

Alice appears to have been an unwed mother who wanted to have her child adopted. It's sounding like Walton, rather than Sefton, might have been the place for that in 1936.
Title: Re: 1936 birth location in Liverpool
Post by: Blue70 on Sunday 26 March 17 17:57 BST (UK)
The "adopted" note will have been added after the birth was registered. My Dad had a brother who was adopted out of the family. His birth was registered in January. We knew his adoption name so ordered his adoption certificate. He was adopted in August of the same year so the note saying adopted on the original birth registration entry was added 7 months later.


Blue
Title: Re: 1936 birth location in Liverpool
Post by: Blue70 on Sunday 26 March 17 19:52 BST (UK)
The bigger picture here is that I have a DNA match with a woman living in greater Liverpool. We believe her grandfather was my uncle James. He married a Sarah Stokes but had mental problems already when they married, and was eventually put away. I was hoping this birth cert would list Sarah, not Alice, as the mother. Given the oddity of omitting the name of the hospital, though, I'm wondering how accurate the rest of the cert is!

I will look for adoption records and other birth records next. The RootsChat community is great. Thanks for your help!

James Fogarty and Sarah Stokes married in 1936 didn't they? I can't see any Fogarty children with mother's surname as Stokes in the birth indexes on Free BMD so that must be the reason you were looking at the illegitimate birth in 1936. That birth was in quarter 3 (Jul/Aug/Sep) of 1936 so was after the marriage which was in quarter 1 (Jan/Feb/Mar) of 1936. If the child was theirs the child would have been a Fogarty with mother as Sarah Stokes. Have you looked at the Stokes/Stokes birth in Q2 1934 in West Derby? West Derby registration district covered part of Liverpool. I haven't named the child as she may still be living.   


Blue