RootsChat.Com

Old Photographs, Recognition, Handwriting Deciphering => Free Photo Restoration & Date Old Photographs => Topic started by: cazza59 on Saturday 14 February 15 14:23 GMT (UK)

Title: Not a priority - Date/Colour/Restore if you have the time. No 2
Post by: cazza59 on Saturday 14 February 15 14:23 GMT (UK)
I'm just posting these while I have the time sorry if it looks like I'm being greedy, but as I said, not a priority.


Caz

Title: Re: Not a priority - Date/Colour/Restore if you have the time. No 2
Post by: cazza59 on Saturday 14 February 15 14:26 GMT (UK)
This is the back.  I find this one interesting because the children (to me anyway) look like a boy and a girl but are dressed identically.

Caz
Title: Re: Not a priority - Date/Colour/Restore if you have the time. No 2
Post by: Treetotal on Saturday 14 February 15 14:28 GMT (UK)
Do you think this lady has the look of the lady in the Vanderbilt photo Caz ??
Carol
Title: Re: Not a priority - Date/Colour/Restore if you have the time. No 2
Post by: cazza59 on Saturday 14 February 15 14:39 GMT (UK)
I've just looked at this pic using a magnifying glass and there is a postage mark near the little girls leg and it looks like it reads London MAR(??)  26  12

So possibly 1912 - anyone concur?

                                       
Title: Re: Not a priority - Date/Colour/Restore if you have the time. No 2
Post by: cazza59 on Saturday 14 February 15 14:40 GMT (UK)
Comparing them side by side, same hairstyle but different facial features.

Title: Re: Not a priority - Date/Colour/Restore if you have the time. No 2
Post by: Treetotal on Saturday 14 February 15 14:45 GMT (UK)
Looking at the man's collar my guess it could have been from 1905 up to the war years...so yes...Maybe I'm being fanciful but I thought they looked like they could be related  ::)
Carol
Title: Re: Not a priority - Date/Colour/Restore if you have the time. No 2
Post by: catfordcrooner on Saturday 14 February 15 14:49 GMT (UK)
I was looking at Lander, Shanklin photographers and it appeared to be a family profession stretching from Victorian times to just before the second world war, so unable to date from that research.
Title: Re: Not a priority - Date/Colour/Restore if you have the time. No 2
Post by: cazza59 on Saturday 14 February 15 14:53 GMT (UK)
Sitting here with my magnifying glass like Inspector Clouseau,  ::) ::) ;D ;D  I don't think they are related.

Pretty sure that's what the post imprint says ie 12 as in 1912 -   I hope I so anyway!

Title: Re: Not a priority - Date/Colour/Restore if you have the time. No 2
Post by: cazza59 on Saturday 14 February 15 14:55 GMT (UK)
Thanks Jeff, you've saved me going done that route for nothing.  Much appreciated.  :) :)

 I'll scan just the area by the little girls leg and see if I can get the imprint visible (I can only see it by tilting the photo).

Title: Re: Not a priority - Date/Colour/Restore if you have the time. No 2
Post by: catfordcrooner on Saturday 14 February 15 14:59 GMT (UK)
You'll have to tilt the scanner then ;D ;D ;D
Title: Re: Not a priority - Date/Colour/Restore if you have the time. No 2
Post by: Treetotal on Saturday 14 February 15 15:03 GMT (UK)
I'm wondering why there would be a postmark when there is no message written on the back and no postage stamp Caz?

Carol
Title: Re: Not a priority - Date/Colour/Restore if you have the time. No 2
Post by: cazza59 on Saturday 14 February 15 15:19 GMT (UK)
You'll have to tilt the scanner then ;D ;D ;D

Smarty Pants!  :P :P :P :P :P ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D
Title: Re: Not a priority - Date/Colour/Restore if you have the time. No 2
Post by: cazza59 on Saturday 14 February 15 15:23 GMT (UK)
I'm wondering why there would be a postmark when there is no message written on the back and no postage stamp Caz?

Carol

I know it's weird.  If you look on the one posted, you can just see parts of the circle of the post mark near her legs.  And why would they stamp the front and not the back??

Title: Re: Not a priority - Date/Colour/Restore if you have the time. No 2
Post by: cazza59 on Saturday 14 February 15 15:49 GMT (UK)
I couldn't get it to show up with the scanner, so I took a photo with my phone...

Caz
Title: Re: Not a priority - Date/Colour/Restore if you have the time. No 2
Post by: cazza59 on Saturday 14 February 15 16:14 GMT (UK)
That has to be the date, what a stroke of luck!  :D :D :D  I would not have noticed that in the day time...

Title: Re: Not a priority - Date/Colour/Restore if you have the time. No 2
Post by: RecycledHippy on Saturday 14 February 15 17:17 GMT (UK)
Hippy  :) :) :)
Title: Re: Not a priority - Date/Colour/Restore if you have the time. No 2
Post by: cazza59 on Saturday 14 February 15 17:21 GMT (UK)
That's so pretty and delicate, again you've done a wonderful job Hippy!  So very much appreciated!  :-* :-*

Beautiful, subtle colouring!  8) 8) 8)

Caz
Title: Re: Not a priority - Date/Colour/Restore if you have the time. No 2
Post by: Treetotal on Saturday 14 February 15 17:58 GMT (UK)
Nice one Hippy  8) You've done some great work today  ;)
Carol
Title: Re: Not a priority - Date/Colour/Restore if you have the time. No 2
Post by: chinakay on Saturday 14 February 15 18:21 GMT (UK)
1912-1915 if the lady's up to date, and if that's a postmark of 1912 she's right on the cutting edge, so to speak, of hairstyle fashion :) Very tight date window.

Lander seems to have been a photographer in Shanklin, Isle of Wight.

Another beauty, Caz. I love the man's face, he looks like he has a sense of humour  :)

Cheers,
China
Title: Re: Not a priority - Date/Colour/Restore if you have the time. No 2
Post by: cazza59 on Tuesday 17 February 15 03:12 GMT (UK)
It is lovely isn't it.  Thanks for the confirmation, so good to have a narrow dateline.
  :) :)


Caz