RootsChat.Com

General => The Common Room => Topic started by: Nettie on Tuesday 20 January 15 10:56 GMT (UK)

Title: Lied
Post by: Nettie on Tuesday 20 January 15 10:56 GMT (UK)
Do I take this as written that Thomas Nolan lied about his address and therefore it hasn't been recorded? Not come across it before.

http://churchrecords.irishgenealogy.ie/churchrecords/details/6e5cf50455228 (http://churchrecords.irishgenealogy.ie/churchrecords/details/6e5cf50455228)

Thanks.
Title: Re: Lied
Post by: Mike in Cumbria on Tuesday 20 January 15 11:40 GMT (UK)
Unless there's a place called Lied, it does look like it.
Title: Re: Lied
Post by: fifer1947 on Tuesday 20 January 15 11:41 GMT (UK)
I'd want to see the original record, to see what address was actually given?
Title: Re: Lied
Post by: LizzieW on Tuesday 20 January 15 12:16 GMT (UK)
I did a search for my husband's 3 x g.grandfather and found his baptism, but not his marriage.  The address on the baptism is shown as NR (not registered) however, there was a copy of the actual parish record, which showed him as Charles Connor of Charles and Mary Ferny.  I'm assuming this means that Mary Ferny was her maiden name, rather than Charles Connor was the son of Mr and Mrs Ferny as all the records are similarly written and I can't believe all the baptisms were of children with parents with different surnames.

I found a baptism for my husband's 2 x g.grandfather in 1823, this time the parish record showed his father as Charles Connor and the address was shown as Constitution Hill.

I notice quite a few of the records state that "The church register page containing this record has not yet been imaged", and this seems to be what the record you've found states.  Unless you can access the parish record, I guess you'll just have to wait until that particular record has been imaged.
Title: Re: Lied
Post by: Sinann on Tuesday 20 January 15 18:48 GMT (UK)
I did a search for my husband's 3 x g.grandfather and found his baptism, but not his marriage.  The address on the baptism is shown as NR (not registered)

Fairly sure NR means not recorded.

NLI plans at the moment to put it's parish records online in the summer, I don't know if these will include this Tralee set, you could check here http://www.nli.ie/en/parish-register.aspx
If it goes ahead it's won't be searchable by name only by parish.
Title: Re: Lied
Post by: LizzieW on Tuesday 20 January 15 21:29 GMT (UK)
Sinnan - Yes I meant not recorded - and looking at the parish record on line, there was no room for any addresses to be recorded.  By the time my husband's 2 x g.grandfather was baptised in 1823 the parish records looked more official with headings for names and address.
Title: Re: Lied
Post by: Nettie on Wednesday 21 January 15 03:12 GMT (UK)
Thanks all for your comments. I don't believe he is my Thomas but it will be interesting to read the original and any subsequent notes if they become available.
Title: Re: Lied
Post by: Sonas on Wednesday 21 January 15 21:29 GMT (UK)
There are loads of other examples of 'Lied' given in the Tralee parish records. Suggests it is a placename. I don't think a priest would have accepted someone lying anyway.
Title: Re: Lied
Post by: fifer1947 on Wednesday 21 January 15 22:21 GMT (UK)
Placenames Tralee http://www.irishtimes.com/ancestor/fuses/plu/index.cfm?pluid=155&order=placename
Title: Re: Lied
Post by: heywood on Wednesday 21 January 15 22:37 GMT (UK)
http://titheapplotmentbooks.nationalarchives.ie/search/tab/home.jsp shows Howard (Godparents name) in Lyad, in the parish of Ratass. (1824)

There is also a John Nolan in Lahard, Kilbonane Parish (1827)
Title: Re: Lied
Post by: Nettie on Thursday 22 January 15 21:47 GMT (UK)
Good find, Heywood, thanks. Maybe he wasn't a liar after all.