RootsChat.Com
Some Special Interests => Occupation Interests => Topic started by: johngosling on Friday 31 October 14 11:03 GMT (UK)
-
Hi,
I've just received a fantastic indenture document, detailing a 1797 indenture of a Thomas Prigg of Devon to his father, also Thomas Prigg.
I'm curious to understand why a father would feel the need to indenture his own son? Would he not simply pass the skills on as a matter of course and provide a roof over his child's head? Why was there a need to formalise the arrangement in this manner?
Many thanks,
John
-
The Statute of Apprentices 1563, made apprenticeship compulsory for anyone who wished to enter a trade. An apprenticeship usually lasted seven years. The apprentice could not marry or set up business on his own account until he had finished his training.
See https://familysearch.org/learn/wiki/en/Apprenticeship_in_England
Stan
-
Thanks Stan.
The Statute of Apprentices 1563, made apprenticeship compulsory for anyone who wished to enter a trade. An apprenticeship usually lasted seven years. The apprentice could not marry or set up business on his own account until he had finished his training.
See https://familysearch.org/learn/wiki/en/Apprenticeship_in_England
Stan
-
Hi,
I have just read your post as I am in the midst of trying to find some apprentice records for some of my family. From what I have read in the last few days about mills and the woollen industry it seems that woolcombers were a very organised bunch. They were very protective over their trade and took part in many of the labour riots in the 18th/19th century.
Apparently the trade guild (?) stipulated that a wool comber could pass the trade or teach his son by means of a formal apprenticeship. My ancestry is in Devon but I think this applied nationally. So maybe that is why you have this situation.
Best wishes.