RootsChat.Com
Research in Other Countries => Europe => Topic started by: roycymru on Sunday 31 August 14 12:22 BST (UK)
-
Hello
Can I please call on your expertese again. The attached related to the marriage of a Wilhelm Jarzombek. With this marriage entry there seems to be lots of associated notes. Can you please translate the entry plus the notes.
Regards
-
Are you able to help Rudolf?
Kind regards
Roy
-
I think the notes say that the marriage was later annulled on the grounds that the partners were related to each other.
-
As Cadenus says...
Das Geistliche Ehegericht (Fürstbischöfliches Konsistorium[)] zu Breslau hat die Eheschließung zwischen Wilhelm Jarzombek
und Franciska Dlugaj unter dem 25. Januar 1900 (C.I.193a) für nichtig erklärt, weil die Kontrahenten blutver-
wandt sind im 3ten Grade, der den 4ten berührt, und keine Dispens erbeten wurde. Woischnik, den 5. März 1900. Kiebel, Pfarrer.
The Holy Marriage Tribunal (Episcopal Consistorium) at Breslau on 25 January 1900 ([reg.no.]C.I.193a) declared the marriage between Wilhelm Jarzombek and Franciska Dlugaj to be null because the parties are related by consanguinity in the 3rd degree, bordering on the 4th degree, and no dispensation had been sought. Woischnik, 5 March 1900. Kiebel, Priest.
3rd degree is the relation between uncle/aunt and niece/nephew, 4th degree would be 1st cousins.
Adrian
-
Thank you Adrian
The entry:
Wilhelm Jarzombek, Woischnik, Junggeselle, Ackerbürger (farmer), 21 3/4;
Francisca Dlugaj, Jungfrau (both had been unmarried), 19 3/4
Peter Dlugaj, Ackerbürger, Woischnik, Caroline born Schewczyk, [her parents]
Jos. Cogiel, Woischnik; Peter Ordon, Glarowka [witnesses]
kathol.
Regards
Rudolf
-
:)Excellent work again, thank you.
A scandal in the family tree!