RootsChat.Com

England (Counties as in 1851-1901) => England => Durham => Topic started by: brushbroomstick on Monday 10 March 14 13:31 GMT (UK)

Title: Why all these Spanish families in Sedgefield in the mid 1600s.
Post by: brushbroomstick on Monday 10 March 14 13:31 GMT (UK)
Thomas Rudd married Jeronima and had a child John baptised in Staindrop in 1691. I cannot find trace of their marriage. I cannot find a birth for Thomas but have found several children with the name Jeronima/Geronima baptised in Sedgefield between 1662 and 1671. The parents of these children are Spanish by their names. There are in Sedgefield 5 families named Quatrado among other Spanish sounding names with children baptised in this period .What is the connection between all these Spanish families settling in Sedgefield?
Title: Re: Why all these Spanish families in Sedgefield in the mid 1600s.
Post by: LizzieL on Monday 10 March 14 13:58 GMT (UK)
When the Spanish Armada was defeated in 1588, a lot of the ships were shipwrecked of the coast of Britain when they were trying to get back to Spain. I was told as a child that our school secretary's husband's family was descended from one of the shipwrecked sailors. This was in south Dorset and there were other families locally with surnames supposed to have similar Spanish origins 
Title: Re: Why all these Spanish families in Sedgefield in the mid 1600s.
Post by: davidft on Monday 10 March 14 15:06 GMT (UK)
Deleted - in view of later posts
Title: Re: Why all these Spanish families in Sedgefield in the mid 1600s.
Post by: stanmapstone on Monday 10 March 14 16:57 GMT (UK)
There is obviously  a mistake in the LDS system. If you look up the film number 1332356  in the LDS Library it is for Registros parroquiales, 1569-1887  Iglesia Católica. San Juan (Nava del Rey, Valladolid) Spain, Valladolid, Nava del Rey - Church records, nothing to do with Sedgefield, see http://is.gd/weLrjc

Stan
Title: Re: Why all these Spanish families in Sedgefield in the mid 1600s.
Post by: jon541 on Monday 10 March 14 17:12 GMT (UK)
Good detective work from Stan there ... I thought for one moment you were suggesting, brushbroomstick, that Jeronimy/Jeronima Rudd was Spanish purely on the basis of her Christian name (a search on FamilySearch for 17thC baptisms in County Durham with mother = Jeronimy turns up several other examples from families other than Rudd ... including at least one other in Staindrop).

Much less interesting of course than would have been the story of a whole bunch of Spaniards parachuting into Sedgefield at a time when Catholics would not have been made very welcome!

Jon
(Great x 6 grandson of Jeronimy Rudd)
Title: Re: Why all these Spanish families in Sedgefield in the mid 1600s.
Post by: stanmapstone on Monday 10 March 14 18:41 GMT (UK)
At that date the names in the parish registers would be in Latin, so Jeronimy/Jeronima is someones transcription of what they thought it was.

Stan

 
Title: Re: Why all these Spanish families in Sedgefield in the mid 1600s.
Post by: jon541 on Monday 10 March 14 19:33 GMT (UK)
Not in Latin - the 3 baptisms to this couple are transcribed variously on the IGI as 'Thomas & Jeronima', 'Thomas & Jerry' and 'Thomas & Heronimy' which (unfortunately I can't confirm against my notes from the Staindrop registers as they are currently separated from me by the North Sea) I'm sure are faithful transcriptions of the original entries in English.  I'm fairly sure that the LDS have always sought where possible to transcribe as written rather than to interpret or translate.

It's fun to be able to claim descent from Tom & Jerry  ;)

Jon
Title: Re: Why all these Spanish families in Sedgefield in the mid 1600s.
Post by: clayton bradley on Monday 10 March 14 20:08 GMT (UK)
it is unusual, isn't it? Hieronymus is Latin for Jerome/Jeremy but I don't remember seeing a feminine version before, claytonbradley
Title: Re: Why all these Spanish families in Sedgefield in the mid 1600s.
Post by: jon541 on Monday 10 March 14 22:20 GMT (UK)
It certainly is.  I'm sure you have the right Latin root for it with Hieronima but there are only a handful of examples across the UK and all restricted to the 1642-1710 date bracket (ignoring the Spanish interlopers which as Stan pointed out earlier are clearly an LDS error).

There are also variants spelt Jeromiah and even Jeromimah which support your point about Hieronymus being Latin for Jerome or Jeremy.

I suppose it's fair to say that most male names have or have had a direct female equivalent so there's no reason why the same shouldn't apply to Jeremy/Jerome.
Title: Re: Why all these Spanish families in Sedgefield in the mid 1600s.
Post by: brushbroomstick on Tuesday 11 March 14 11:18 GMT (UK)
I am very curious! I have Rudds from Staindrop - George Rudd 1740 my 4x gr grandfather and wonder if Thomas and Jeronima are related to him.
I would also like to find a birth and a marriage for Thomas and Jeronima as these two are probable ancestors of mine.
Title: Re: Why all these Spanish families in Sedgefield in the mid 1600s.
Post by: jimmy blue on Friday 14 April 23 14:41 BST (UK)
What you should be looking at is Kirk Merrington, not far from Sedgefield in and around the early 1700s.

There are 100s of records for Spanish born people in the area and it's got nothing to do with the Armada.

These people were Calč, spanish-gypsies. I am a descendent of this wave of migration, recently confirmed through genealogy teamwork - thanks to my DNA relative in Spain.

Turns out thousands of spanish-gypsy refugees arrived on British Shores at this time, escaping the inquisition. I don't know, but I think that the lords of the mannor around Spenneymoor, the Salvin's were an uber catholic family and likely granted their Spanish counterparts refuge.

There was another cluster of these families around Wilton, Somerset. They eventually married in with already existing Romanichal families in the UK, in particular County Durham.