RootsChat.Com

England (Counties as in 1851-1901) => England => Buckinghamshire => Topic started by: jaywit on Monday 18 February 13 20:41 GMT (UK)

Title: Did George and Alice Rogers come from Buckinghamshire?
Post by: jaywit on Monday 18 February 13 20:41 GMT (UK)
I wonder if anyone has any thoughts on this couple?

George and Alice Rogers appear in 1777 baptising children in Marston St Lawrence Northants.

I know they didn't marry in Northants and also George wasn't baptised in Northants.

There are some online family trees which suggest Alice was nee Richardson and they came from Buckinghamshire.

George was born c1752.

I won't copy the online information but I wonder if anyone has any PR records that would fit in with a marriage and baptisms?
Title: Re: Did George and Alice Rogers come from Buckinghamshire?
Post by: bucksboy on Monday 18 February 13 21:56 GMT (UK)
Have you contacted BucksFHS to do a database search for a marriage and possible baptisms for George & Alice.

http://www.bucksfhs.org.uk/index.php?option=com_content&task=blogcategory&id=17&Itemid=199

Steve. :)
Title: Re: Did George and Alice Rogers come from Buckinghamshire?
Post by: CCRAIL on Saturday 20 April 13 20:26 BST (UK)
Hi
According to the entry in Vol 4 of Philimores Marriages for Chalfont St. Giles:

Geo Rogers & Alice Stevens married on 15/02/1777.

Looks about right, i guess as you have the baptism dates you can see if this is too early or too late?

As you probably know, Philimores does not give any other info.

Hope this helps
ccrail
Title: Re: Did George and Alice Rogers come from Buckinghamshire?
Post by: CCRAIL on Saturday 20 April 13 20:32 BST (UK)
Hi again

PS its also here in FreeREg, but no further info.
http://www.freereg.org.uk/cgi/SearchResults.pl?RecordType=Marriages&RecordID=2422288
Title: Re: Did George and Alice Rogers come from Buckinghamshire?
Post by: jaywit on Tuesday 23 April 13 09:15 BST (UK)
Hi I've not been getting notifications of replies, so sorry for the delay.

I am as convinced as I can be so far back that the Rogers/ Richardson marriage is correct.

I have worked on naming pattens, not much else I can do with so little information. Thanks anyway for your look ups.