RootsChat.Com

England (Counties as in 1851-1901) => England => Norfolk => Topic started by: Genie Jim on Tuesday 15 February 11 23:05 GMT (UK)

Title: BIX & LINES family
Post by: Genie Jim on Tuesday 15 February 11 23:05 GMT (UK)
Would like to hear from anyone related and/or can add or correct following:

William BIX (BIXX / BICKES / BICKS / BEC / BOX)
Married 15 Dec 1813 in Matlaske, Norfolk Co., ENG, Susan LINES, b. c. 1786 in ENG, d. 27 Sept 1836 in Cornwall, Ont., CAN.

Children:
i. Christiana b. 25 Dec 1815, in Matlaske, Norfolk Co., ENG, d. 19 Oct 1901 in Deep River, Arenac Co., MI, USA; Married 26 Oct 1838 in Cornwall, Ont., CAN, John MORLEY, b. c. 1811 in ENG, d. 9 Sept 1888 in Adams, Arenac Co., MI, USA.
ii. James BIX, b. 1818, baptized 26 Jul 1818 in Matlaske, Norfolk Co., ENG.
iii. David BIX, b. 1820, baptized 19 Nov 1820 in Matlaske, Norfolk Co., ENG.
Married 1842 to Eliza NETTLES.
iv. Stephen BIX, b. 1823, baptized 13 Jul 1823 in Matlaske, Norfolk Co., ENG.

Thank you, Jim.
Title: Re: BIX & LINES family
Post by: alimag on Wednesday 16 February 11 09:30 GMT (UK)
Hi
  Marriage record shown as susanna lines, found another daughter mary baptism 24 jul 1814 matlaske.you have correct info on the other children these records are on family search record search.


regards alan
Title: Re: BIX & LINES family
Post by: Yorkslass on Wednesday 16 February 11 09:33 GMT (UK)
Hello Jim,

The Freereg site has all the baptisms you have, plus one other - that of Mary, baptised 24 July 1814 by William and Susanna Bix at Matlaske.  
http://www.freereg.org.uk/cgi/SearchResults.pl?RecordType=Baptisms&RecordID=4945528

There seemed to be another Bix couple in Matlask, baptising children around the same time - John and Rachel.

I've had a look at William and Susan's marriage on the pilot Family Search site, and see that one of the witnesses was a Rachel Bix - the other being Nathaniel Lines.
http://www.rootschat.com/links/0bv3/

Yorkslass










Title: Re: BIX & LINES family
Post by: Genie Jim on Thursday 17 February 11 18:39 GMT (UK)
Thanks so much for your feedback/info. Jim.