RootsChat.Com

General => The Common Room => The Lighter Side => Topic started by: waralan on Saturday 09 October 10 20:45 BST (UK)

Title: Being and equal part
Post by: waralan on Saturday 09 October 10 20:45 BST (UK)
Being and equal part Norwegian as well as English, I couldn't help notice that Great Britian was invaded by them.  Is there any vesteds of that now?
Title: Re: Being and equal part
Post by: Hackstaple on Saturday 09 October 10 21:44 BST (UK)
The Orkney Islands  maintain very strong links with Norway, particularly Bergen.

Most inhabitants of the Shetland Isles are of Norwegian descent.
Title: Re: Being and equal part
Post by: crisane on Saturday 09 October 10 21:55 BST (UK)
I found this website which gives some interesting basic information. Put www in front
vikingart.com/Vikings.htm

Title: Re: Being and equal part
Post by: waralan on Saturday 09 October 10 23:02 BST (UK)
Thanks all who answered.
Title: Re: Being and equal part
Post by: Springbok on Sunday 10 October 10 00:43 BST (UK)
Hi waralan ,

you might try "Googling" Viking DNA. There was a televised research project to see how many present day Scottish islanders had Norwegian/Viking DNA.

The conclusion was that ,rather than being a war like invasion, they intermarried with the Celtic populations.All of the descendants had variations in their Viking Ancestry.

Spring
Title: Re: Being and equal part
Post by: waralan on Sunday 10 October 10 01:04 BST (UK)
Springbrook, thanks I will try that.
Title: Re: Being and equal part
Post by: Valda on Sunday 10 October 10 08:46 BST (UK)
Hi


Viking place names particularly in Yorkshire and words within the English language

http://www.viking.no/e/england/e-viking_english.htm

As far as Iceland is concerned it was a two way process

'Most Icelanders are descendants of Norwegian settlers and Celts from Ireland and Scotland, brought over as slaves during the age of settlement. Recent DNA analysis suggests that around 66 percent of the male settler-era population was of Norse ancestry, whereas the female population was 60 percent Celtic'


After the Vikings came the Normans who are often perceived just as french but where in fact

'The Normans were the people who gave their name to Normandy, a region in northern France. They were descended from Viking conquerors of the territory and the native population of mostly Frankish and Gallo-Roman stock. Their identity emerged initially in the first half of the tenth century, and gradually evolved over succeeding centuries. The name "Normans" derives from Nortmanni (Northmen), after the Vikings who founded Normandy.'

Sources Wikipedia


Regards

Valda
Title: Re: Being and equal part
Post by: waralan on Sunday 10 October 10 13:39 BST (UK)
Valda, from my understanding either Eric the Red or his son discovered Ice Land.
Title: Re: Being and equal part
Post by: Valda on Sunday 10 October 10 13:49 BST (UK)
Hi

Greenland not Iceland

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Iceland

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Erik_the_Red


Regards

Valda
Title: Re: Being and equal part
Post by: waralan on Sunday 10 October 10 14:45 BST (UK)
Valda, you're probably right.  I don't know which side of the Alantic you are on, but in the States, there are at least one on computor, online doccumentry , but I emailed it to a person in England. but it was not acessable to her.
Title: Re: Being and equal part
Post by: PrueM on Sunday 10 October 10 20:48 BST (UK)
There's plenty of evidence that Eric the Red did not discover Iceland - Valda's right, it is Greenland you're thinking of  :)

Quote
The results of recent carbon dating work, published in the journal Skírnir, suggests that the country may have been settled as early as the second half of the 7th century.[14]

The first known permanent Norse settler was Ingólfur Arnarson, who built his homestead in Reykjavík in the year 874. Ingólfur was followed by many other emigrant settlers, largely Norsemen and their Irish slaves. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iceland

As Erik the Red was not born until 950 or so, he can't have discovered Iceland  :)

Cheers
Prue
Title: Re: Being and equal part
Post by: waralan on Sunday 10 October 10 23:42 BST (UK)
Prue, I stand corrected.
Title: Re: Being and equal part
Post by: waralan on Sunday 10 October 10 23:50 BST (UK)
Prue, and others I see there is a part of the British Isles that were once under what was known as Dane Law.
Title: Re: Being and equal part
Post by: PrueM on Sunday 10 October 10 23:53 BST (UK)
Yes, there is plenty of information about Danelaw on the web, including:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Danelaw

Basically it was the parts of England (mainly in the north and east) that were inhabited and ruled by Nordic settlers and their descendants, as distinct from the earlier Anglo-Saxon people.
Title: Re: Being and equal part
Post by: waralan on Monday 11 October 10 00:13 BST (UK)
PrueM, I would suspect that covers my grandfather's home county, Cambridgeshire.
Title: Re: Being and equal part
Post by: PrueM on Monday 11 October 10 00:15 BST (UK)
I believe it did cover at least part of the area now (or previously) known as Cambridgeshire, but I'm not really an expert in the Danelaw  :)
Title: Re: Being and equal part
Post by: waralan on Monday 11 October 10 00:34 BST (UK)
Thanks Prue M.
Title: Re: Being and equal part
Post by: Jean McGurn on Monday 11 October 10 14:58 BST (UK)
Tonight on Channel 4 at 8 p.m. there is a Time Team Special: The Real Vikings.

Time Team are following digs around the country that have uncovered a lot of archeaology and provides an insight to the Viking way of life. (Or so it says in my paper)

Jean