RootsChat.Com

Family History Documents and Artefacts => Graveyards and Gravestones => Topic started by: Molly Atkin on Thursday 15 April 10 09:40 BST (UK)

Title: Double marking of graves
Post by: Molly Atkin on Thursday 15 April 10 09:40 BST (UK)
I've found some family graves from mid 19th century that have the usual size of headstone with a much smaller one immediately in front. Sometimes the smaller gravestone appears to have the initials of the person whose name is given in full behind but often the smaller stone obscures part of the inscription on the bigger one. Does anyone know the purpose of the small stone - I thought it might be a temporary marker until the 'real' stone was placed in position but then why leave the small one?

Regards
Molly
Title: Re: Double marking of graves
Post by: C P Rayson on Thursday 15 April 10 10:10 BST (UK)
Hi Molly

We have a number of these in our local Churchyard, usually position at the foot of the grave

Is it possible that yours has been relocated to ease access and/or maintenence

Regards

Chris
Title: Re: Double marking of graves
Post by: Molly Atkin on Thursday 15 April 10 10:39 BST (UK)
I'm not sure but it's a possibility. If the small ones had started off at the foot then moving them to make them flush with the large headstone would certainly help maintenance but why keep them at all as they don't seem to serve any purpose and moving them just covers up part of the larger headstone? It's a mystery to me!

Cheers
Molly
Title: Re: Double marking of graves
Post by: Vasquez109 on Tuesday 20 April 10 11:15 BST (UK)
Hi Molly,

I was about to post the same sort of thing myself, but with a twist. These ones came from Cornwall, but arent at the foot of the grave, but adjacent. Confused me competely as im currently putting photos of the whole cemetery online.

http://www.findagrave.com/cgi-bin/fg.cgi?page=gr&GRid=51375358

David.
Title: Re: Double marking of graves
Post by: Bilge on Tuesday 20 April 10 11:20 BST (UK)
I have come across this myself and I assumed that it was a marker for the grave postion when the coffin was first interred.
Then after the grave had settled the larger stone was put in place. Or was it a marker for a reserved plot, something that I am led to believe occurred a lot during Victorian times.
Title: Re: Double marking of graves
Post by: toni* on Tuesday 20 April 10 11:28 BST (UK)
do you mean the foot stone ?
Title: Re: Double marking of graves
Post by: Molly Atkin on Tuesday 20 April 10 12:53 BST (UK)
But, if it was the initial marker for the grave, why leave it there and put the final, larger headstone immediately behind it so part is obscured? Or is the small stone the foot stone which has been moved to rest against the headstone for purposes of cemetery maintenance? What was the purpose of the foot stone?

Cheers
Molly
Title: Re: Double marking of graves
Post by: Vasquez109 on Tuesday 20 April 10 13:04 BST (UK)
In my case, its to the side by about 3ft! Im confused too!
Title: Re: Double marking of graves
Post by: toni* on Tuesday 20 April 10 13:05 BST (UK)
chris in1066 land will probably knew the answer  :) he is a font of all knowledge when it comes to gravestones and marking
Title: Re: Double marking of graves
Post by: meles on Tuesday 20 April 10 13:09 BST (UK)
I seem to recall that most cemeteries place markers, so that they know who is buried where. They are small, and don't usually have much info - just a reference number or the person's intials - each is different. Some place them at frequent intervals, others, less often.

Then, the deceased's relatives might place their own stone.

Hence, two stones.

meles
Title: Re: Double marking of graves
Post by: Vasquez109 on Saturday 24 April 10 07:24 BST (UK)
But would'nt the smaller one then get removed?
Title: Re: Double marking of graves
Post by: meles on Saturday 24 April 10 08:03 BST (UK)
No, because it's part of the cemetery's location system.

meles