RootsChat.Com
England (Counties as in 1851-1901) => Dorset => England => Dorset Lookup Requests => Topic started by: jode12 on Monday 15 February 10 20:40 GMT (UK)
-
im lokking for information on joshua loveless! i think he was born 1790! he was married to an ann bush who was born in 1794! they had a son called william loveless born 1828! i was just wondering if any one can help me find joshua's parents. any information would be helpful
-
It would help if you could give an indication of the area of the country and how you arrived at the possible dates of birth, please :)
Nell
-
From the IGI:-
Joshua Loveless
Male Christening: 19 DEC 1790 Yetminster, Dorset, England
... but my broadband is giving me hell, and I cant click on his name to see info about parents ! Sorry ...
-
im pretty sure they came from dorset. i got it from family search on the IGI but im stuck now
-
Hi
From Dorset Baptisms:
Leigh ~19 Dec 1790 Joshua Loveless (aged 1 week) son of Joshua and Catherine
It might be him :-\
Gadget
-
OK - off to Dorset with this.
Jode, have a look at the resources section of the Dorset board, particularly for online records. You'll be able to look for yourself and enjoy the hunt. ;)
Nell
-
The record that I found from the Dorset Baptisms is the same as the IGI submitted one that Lydart found - just checked it - familysearch is playing up!
Gdget
-
Hi
OPC Dorset has transcribed a marriage of Josiah LOVELESS & Catherine Taylor both of Leigh married 25 October 1777. (Josiah/Joshua?)
And a Leigh death for Joshua LOVELESS aged 74 died 9 Jan 1865 B1791.
Also FindMyPast has baptisms as follows:
20 Mar 1785 William LOVELESS son of Joshua and Kat of Leigh born 2 days
01 Apr 1798 Ann LOVELESS dau of Joshua & Catherine of Leigh born 24 March
Wide spread of dates but do-able...
Vaz
-
The Dorset OPC Leigh page has baptisms going back to 1677 and marriages back to 1678 ... should provide you with lots more info if you check it ... (I haven't !)
http://www.opcdorset.org/LeighFiles/Leigh.htm
And Jode, don't forget to consider slightly different spelling when you look at records that old ... i.e. Loveless could be Lovelace ...