RootsChat.Com

Beginners => Family History Beginners Board => Topic started by: geoff22 on Friday 20 November 09 23:29 GMT (UK)

Title: Catherine Isaacs
Post by: geoff22 on Friday 20 November 09 23:29 GMT (UK)
Hi I am looking for a Catherine Isaacs born Wolverhampton in 1864.......in particular if an who she married and any children she may have had

Thank you

Geoff
Title: Re: Catherine Isaacs
Post by: CaroleW on Saturday 21 November 09 00:14 GMT (UK)
There are 3 Catherine Isaacs marriage on freebmd between 1884 - 1896 - none in Wolverhampton or even close to there. 

http://freebmd.rootsweb.com
Title: Re: Catherine Isaacs
Post by: joanna69 on Saturday 21 November 09 00:22 GMT (UK)
I've found a Caroline Isaacs in the 1871 census.  She is listed as granddaughter.   Living in Great Berry Street, Wolverhampton.

Esther Nathan 56 - head
Sarah Goldstone 60 - sister
Louise Isaacs  35 - daughter
Joshua Isaacs 4 - grandson
Annie Isaacs 2 - granddaughter
Soloman Isaacs 1 month - grandson
Caroline Isaacs 7 - granddaughter.

I know its not Catherine, but possibly just misheard?  Certainly Catherine existed as she has a birth record (Wolverhampton, Vol 6b, page 441).  So if you get out the certificate it will shed some light on her family and clarify if the above records is in any way related to the lady you are looking for.

There are many Catherine Isaac weddings but all seem to be in the London area.
Title: Re: Catherine Isaacs
Post by: geoff22 on Saturday 21 November 09 02:02 GMT (UK)
Thanks to the two contributors, the census details are correct but where did she go from there I wonder?

Thanks again

Geoff
Title: Re: Catherine Isaacs
Post by: CaroleW on Saturday 21 November 09 02:33 GMT (UK)
Presume this is her parents marriage - it's the only one in Wolverhampton

Marriages March qtr 1863   
 
Lewis Isaacs  Wolverhampton  6B 619   
Louisa  Nathan

You need to check the 1881 for her parents or check freebmd for either of their deaths/re-marriage
Title: Re: Catherine Isaacs
Post by: geoff22 on Saturday 21 November 09 05:48 GMT (UK)
Thanks for that I will get find out via FreebMD

Best wishes

Geoff
Title: Re: Catherine Isaacs
Post by: joanna69 on Saturday 21 November 09 10:07 GMT (UK)
Geoff

I have found the family again in 1881 - living in what reads like "21 Marshall Street", Birmingham.  Again she is listed as Caroline.  Her occupation is given as "Coat Maker".  Her place of birth is given as Dudley, Staffs.

Louisa Isaacs, 40
Caroline Isaacs, 17
Joshua Isaacs, 14
Anne Isaacs, 11
Solomon Isaacs, 10
John Isaacs, 7
Esther Nathan, 66


Title: Re: Catherine Isaacs
Post by: joanna69 on Saturday 21 November 09 10:12 GMT (UK)
And in 1891 I have found Louisa and John Isaacs only living together at 91 Jersey Street, New Cross, Manchester.  No reference to the other family members.
Title: Re: Catherine Isaacs
Post by: joanna69 on Saturday 21 November 09 10:19 GMT (UK)
Looking at the marriages again, there is a Caroline Jane Isaacs marrying a Joseph Henry Gillott in 1885, Ashton-Under-Lyne, Cheshire. 

District: Ashton-Under-Lyne
County: Cheshire
Volume: 8d
Page 660.

Given we know Caroline's mother and brother were living in Manchester in 1891, could it be possible they all moved sometime after the 1881 census?

Ashton-unde-lyne is (according to google maps) just 6 miles from Manchester.  So if they did move, this could be her.  Maybe not, but perhaps worth calling out her birth certificate and this one to see if the father's name matches...
Title: Re: Catherine Isaacs
Post by: joanna69 on Saturday 21 November 09 10:21 GMT (UK)
deleted - sorry, duplicate post
Title: Re: Catherine Isaacs
Post by: Tati on Saturday 21 November 09 10:42 GMT (UK)
Hi all  :)

Sorry, I'm afraid Caroline Jane who marries Mr Gillott isn't the right girl - in 1891 she's age 27, birth place Kenilworth Warwickshire, which seems to match this 1881 girl 

http://search.ancestry.co.uk/cgi-bin/sse.dll?db=uki1881&indiv=try&h=10996176
RG11/4042 9 15

 :(
Title: Re: Catherine Isaacs
Post by: joanna69 on Saturday 21 November 09 11:05 GMT (UK)
Never mind - its best to weed out the wrong ones early on I guess!