RootsChat.Com
England (Counties as in 1851-1901) => England => Sussex => Topic started by: YANQING on Wednesday 21 October 09 00:15 BST (UK)
-
Looking for Cramps from sussex or bexhill ,my gggrandfather Albert Edmund Cramp 1843 Bodiam Sussex Married a Mary Ann Searl,i would like to contact any relo,s who are still there as the family is wearing thin ,i,m an Australian living in China,be good to hear from you bye .
YANGQING
-
Hi Yangquing
Welcome to Rootschat and especially the Sussex Board - we think its one of the best.
Tapped the surname CRAMP into my data archives and it came back with over 100 burials in and around the Bexhill / Battle area between 1720 and 1938
If you send me your e-mail address via private message, (click on the scroll to the left) I will send the details to you by e-mail
I have attached the Bodiam entries to this message
CRAMP Ann 55 22 Feb 1845 Bodiam
CRAMP Anne 29 Apr 1769 Bodiam
CRAMP Edmund 78 6 Oct 1837 Salehurst
CRAMP Elizabeth 23 May 1795 Bodiam
CRAMP Elizabeth 27 Mar 1780 Bodiam
CRAMP Esther 65 27 Dec 1827 Bodiam
CRAMP Happy 9m 27 Oct 1842 Bodiam
CRAMP Hester 9 Nov 1787 Bodiam
CRAMP James 14 Oct 1848 Hawkhurst
CRAMP James 10m 26 Apr 1850 Bodiam
CRAMP Phillis 1 Jan 1767 Bodiam
CRAMP Samuel 20 Aug 1793 Bodiam
CRAMP Sarah Ann 6w 12 Jan 1824 Bodiam
CRAMP Thomas 1 Jan 1767 Bodiam
CRAMP William 28 Jun 1803 Bodiam
Chris in 1066
-
Hi Chris
Thought I would place this request here as you indicated you had a listing of Cramps from Sussex. :)
Can you confirm/deny a Marriage between Thomas Munn b c1746 to Lucy Cramp b c1748? I have seen an IGI marriage between Thomas Munn and Sarah Cramp 1815 but they are too late to be mine - if they are
The info I have came from an IGI Tree but I cant find the supporting info on FindMyPast
-
Thomas "Mun" married Lucy Lewes at Bexhill 5 Nov 1783. No marriage to a Lucy Cramp that I can see on the Sussex pre 1837 marriage index. No records at all for a Lucy Cramp.
-
Thank you sill
Bexhill works for the following family and dates as well :)
Off to chase that one around. But really only 1 N ? :'(
-
Hi
Thank you Sillgen for that speedy reply
I agree with your findings
Chris
-
Only one "n" is not at all unusual in those days as spelling varied a lot. Many people could not read to check what the vicar had written so it all depended on his whim at the time. Other variants on the SMI are MUNNE, MUNE, MUNS and MUNNS so best to search for all of them.