RootsChat.Com

England (Counties as in 1851-1901) => Surrey Lookup Requests => Surrey => England => Surrey Completed Look up Requests => Topic started by: viddavid on Tuesday 13 October 09 16:17 BST (UK)

Title: TIMMIS St.Johns. Richmond Surrey COMPLETED
Post by: viddavid on Tuesday 13 October 09 16:17 BST (UK)
Hello Folks,
Looking for Arthur (father not known) possible son of Elizabeth ( Lizzie) TIMMIS christened/baptised approx 1864/5 in St.Johns church Richmond Surrey.

This is regarding new information received and may be a big hammer to knock down a long standing wall .

http://www.rootschat.com/forum/index.php/topic,290936.0.html

Many thanks
 
Title: Re: TIMMIS St.Johns. Richmond Surrey
Post by: CaroleW on Tuesday 13 October 09 16:25 BST (UK)
Could this be his birth reg from freebmd

Births September qtr 1864 
 
Arthur Timmis    Richmond Surrey  2a 246

Is he thought to be Arthur Robins? 
Title: Re: TIMMIS St.Johns. Richmond Surrey
Post by: viddavid on Tuesday 13 October 09 16:58 BST (UK)
Thank you CaroleW it may well be.
My recently received  information is that Elizabeth TIMMIS gave birth to an "Arthur" in Richmond 1864 and an "Ernest" in  1867 neither birth mentions the fathers name which seem to fit with the two brothers I'm looking for.
By 1871 they were both known as ROBINS.The link tells the story from 1871 but the in between years are a mystery.
I'll send off for this certificate to make sure the father isn't named.
Title: Re: TIMMIS St.Johns. Richmond Surrey
Post by: CaroleW on Tuesday 13 October 09 17:13 BST (UK)
Hi

Just browsing freebmd - the Timmis surname seems to be very prevalent in the Cheshire & Stafford area which would support the 1871 entry where both boys were in Staffordshire

I can't see any census entry for an Arthur Timmis b Surrey in that year and there is no death in that area so it looks a good possibility that he was Arthur Timmis

I have also found this birth which may fit with Ernest who was 4yrs old in 1871

Ernest Timmis September qtr 1866  Birmingham Volume 6d Page 128

Hope it breaks your brick wall after all these years


Title: Re: TIMMIS St.Johns. Richmond Surrey
Post by: viddavid on Tuesday 13 October 09 17:45 BST (UK)
Thanks again CaroleW,

I've just received an email confirming Arthur was Baptised on June 4th.1865 following his birth on 17th.June 1864  at St.Johns church  Richmond Surrey. Mother a singlewoman Elizabeth Timmis.

Yes you are correct about Ernest . Also born to a singlewoman Elizabeth Timmis in Birmingham.

Elizabeth Timmis also had a daughter Ann born illegitimately around 1859. Elizabeth later married a William Austin and had five children with him.(Oh no, another branch of the tree ! )

Now all I have to do is find out what happened between 1867 and 1871 to change the boys names from Timmis to Robins. Adopted perhaps ?
Title: Re: TIMMIS St.Johns. Richmond Surrey
Post by: CaroleW on Tuesday 13 October 09 18:13 BST (UK)
I had already checked freebmd for a Timmis/Robins (Robbins) marriage but nothing came up

I thought mum may have married before 1871 but didn't reckon on it being William Austin.  Like you - I wonder why Robins when there is nobody of that name in the same household.  Perhaps it was to throw new hubby off the scent!!

She married in December qtr 1866 under Timmis which rules out a prior marriage - particularly as Ernest was only born earlier the same year

Sounds like either new husband didn't want the children or even worse - didn't know about them 

Marriages December qtr 1866 
 
William Austin  Stoke on Trent  6b 245   
Elizabeth Timmis
 
Title: Re: TIMMIS St.Johns. Richmond Surrey
Post by: CaroleW on Tuesday 13 October 09 18:28 BST (UK)
Do you already have this 1871 entry - address Bucknall Hanley

John Timmis 68 b Audlem Cheshire - farmer of 20 acres
Thomas   28 b Stoke on Trent
William Austin 29 son in law butcher b Stoke on Trent
Elizabeth Austin 33 b Norton
Ann Timmis 11 g/dtr b Stoke on Trent
Elizabeth Ann Timmis g/dtr 4 b Stoke on Trent (probably should be Austin)
Dorothy Timmis 1 g/dtr b Stoke on Trent  (probably should be Austin)
RG10 Piece 2861 Folio 55 Page 30

1861 for Bucknall

John Timmis 58 b Audlem - farmer 114 acres
Samuel 29 b Bagnall
Elizabeth  23 b Norton
all following children b Stoke
Lucy   20
Thomas   18
Richard   16
William   14
Elizabeth A g/dtr 1 (I wonder is this Ann)
RG9 Piece 1933 Folio 100 Page 8
Title: Re: TIMMIS St.Johns. Richmond Surrey
Post by: viddavid on Tuesday 13 October 09 19:12 BST (UK)
Looks like William Austin moved into his father- in- laws house with his new bride. Elizabeths first child Ann seems to be living in the house but the two brothers are missing.
I see the farm has shrunk from 114 acres to 20.
Title: Re: TIMMIS St.Johns. Richmond Surrey COMPLETED
Post by: viddavid on Saturday 05 August 17 10:51 BST (UK)
Started to dabble in the black art of DNA to try to get those bricks falling. After two more years today I got a match with a possible fourth to sixth cousin...not particularly remarkable...I get these frequently but always on my maternal side. Todays match is only with myself and my brother which is very unusual and I wondered if this was a paternal match.
The matching cousin has a family tree on Ancestry ( I know, treat it with a pinch of salt ) but his great great grandmother was Elizabeth Caroline Louisa TIMMIS (not the one mentioned in earlier posts ). The tree is unsourced but the dates fit with intriguing gaps . Here we go again :) 
Title: Re: TIMMIS St.Johns. Richmond Surrey COMPLETED
Post by: gilaves on Monday 28 May 18 10:17 BST (UK)
Ernest Robins was my grandfather, and i have just had DNA test results, which are 52% English 29.1 % Irish/scottish / welsh.the remainder scandinavian. I wish i knew who his father was. What was Elizabeth or Ernest to you..?
Title: Re: TIMMIS St.Johns. Richmond Surrey COMPLETED
Post by: viddavid on Monday 28 May 18 10:55 BST (UK)
Hello "gilaves" I'm guessing we know each other  :) and have corresponded via email if your brothers are D(*) and T(*) and mother was Hilda May Robins ?
I'm David grandson of Arthur Robins who was brother of Ernest. Elizabeth would be our shared great grandmother. There is no paper trail to prove this so hopefully your DNA test result will match up with someone. Which company did you test with ?

Moderator comment: names of potentially living people removed