RootsChat.Com
General => Armed Forces => Topic started by: moli on Wednesday 22 October 08 13:23 BST (UK)
-
I am trying to trace Francis Thompson (Thomson) born about 1847 in Scotland. (He died in 1882 in Staffordshire, age 35, according to the death certificate.) I have just received an extract from Scotlandspeople of a marriage on 31 December 1869 in the District of St. Clement, Dundee of Francis THOMPSON (age 23) to Catherine MILLER (age 21).
Francis Thompson profession is listed as:
Private 25th Foot
Regimental No. 724
His address was: with the Regiment
Was there a garrison or base of the 25th Foot in Dundee during late1869?
regards,
moli
-
Hi Moli
One of my relatives was a drill instructor at Dudhope Castle in Dundee in the 1860s and 1870s. He was a sergeant with the 61st Foot. So I would imagine that various different groups of soldiers from different units were probably stationed there on garrison duty.
I have some pictures of Dudhope Castle, including one of a group of soldiers taken about 1870, and a map showing the location (its not there any longer). If you would like copies of these just send me a pm with your email address.
Regards
Ruby
-
Hi Moli !
If you want to try for his papers .... heres some tips .... although I know you said he died in 1882 ... you might still be lucky !
Annie :)
In 1873 the Regiment was allocated a Depot at York, and in 1881, when territorial titles and regimental districts were introduced, it was proposed that the 25th Foot should be re-designated ‘The York Regiment (King’s Own Borderers)’. Parliament was successfully lobbied, and on 29th July 1881 ‘The King’s Own Borderers’ moved to a new Depot at Berwick-upon-Tweed Barracks. The national origins of the Regiment were further recognised in 1887 when it acquired its present title ‘The King’s Own Scottish Borderers’.
http://www.kosb.co.uk/history.htm
-
Themonsstar gave this reply to somebody else asking for the 25th foot ...
Service Records
Or Soldiers documents
WO97 records are attestation and discharge papers, often referred to as soldiers' documents, in series which covers the period between 1760 and 1913. Some papers between 1785 and 1813 are in WO 121. They are described in more detail in a Research Guide British Army: Soldiers' Discharge Papers, 1760-1913 at the NA
They are almost always referred to as 'service' records. But as the medals expert John Sly reminds us: 'They are not, they are pension records, specifically Royal Hospital, Chelsea, pension records.
They are copies of documents that were given to a largely illiterate soldiery, specifying the man's name, trade and place of birth, as well as his physical description, forming a proof of his identity and entitlement to draw his pension if he could not sign his own name.
Once this is appreciated it immediately becomes obvious why so few individual records survive: only a relatively small proportion of soldiers were pensioned, either for disability or long service. In particular if a soldier died in service, or deserted and so did not complete his term of enlistment, it is unlikely that there will be a record for him. Researchers should not forget the records for the Royal Hospital in Dublin, Kilmainham, which was operating in tandem with Chelsea at this time, and it was not specifically an institution for Irishmen or soldiers from 'Irish' regiments. It is probably because the Kilmainham records are not filed or indexed in the same way as the Chelsea records that they are so often ignored.
Before 1883 these service records are normally only for men who were discharged and received a pension. From 1883 to 1913 the series also includes soldiers who were discharged for other reasons, such as termination of limited engagements or discharge by purchase.
The types of document that have most commonly survived are, although it is unusual to find them all in a single file:
• discharge forms, which were issued when a soldier left the regiment. The purpose, initially at least, seems to have been to have been proof for the
poor law authorities that the individual was not a vagrant as he passed through the area on his way home or in search of work.
• attestation forms, which are the documents signed by the new recruit.They will tell you how old he was at enlistement, where he enlisted and his
trade before he joined up. There may also be details of next of kin.
• The proceedings of a regimental board and record of service, which was a more detailed record of discharge.
• Supporting correspondence. Occasionally there might be scribbled notes on the application itself.
• Questionnaires of past service, which an applicant for a pension completed if others documents had not survived.
• Affidavits, which out-pensioners outside London made every quarter to state that they were not drawing on other public funds.
Except for the earliest documents, where the level of detail is limited, the documents give information about age, physical appearance, birthplace and trade or occupation on enlistment in the Army. They also include a record of service, including any decorations awarded, promotions and reductions in rank, crimes and punishments, and the reason for the discharge to pension. In some cases, the place of residence after discharge and date of death are also given.
These documents are arranged by discharge date and then by regiment or by surname. The order within individual piece numbers is roughly alphabetical. If you can't find your man then it is also worth looking though the misfiled records to see if he appears there.
With the exception of some records between 1883 and 1913, the records have been microfilmed and are available in the Microfilm Reading Room at Kew. The documents fall into four series:
1760-1854 These documents are arranged alphabetically by name within regiments. Fortunately there is a comprehensive index which is available on TNA's online catalogue (just type in the name of the person you are researching). This index also includes records found in WO 121. There seem to be relatively few for men who enlisted before 1792.
1855—1872 These are again arranged alphabetically by name within a regiment, and it is vital to know the regiment in which a man served.
1873-1882 These are arranged alphabetically by name of soldier by cavalry, artillery, infantry and miscellaneous corps.
1883-1913 The documents are arranged in surname order. Details of next of kin, wife and children are given.
Additional series of service records
If you can't find your man in WO 97 and think that he survived to receive a pension, there are several other places for you to look.
-
continued !
WO116 and WO117 are pension books which contain similar information, but are split into disability and long-service respectively, and are indexed chronologically by date of admission to Chelsea pension. WO120 contains pension books arranged regimentally by order of precedence, then chronologically by date of admission to Chelsea pension.
WO118 and WO119 are records for Kilmainham Hospital in Dublin, WO118 being arranged chronologically by date of admission to pension, giving a numerical key to WO119, which is the equivalent of WO97, but in bound book form rather than loose in boxes. This can be a long process if you do not know the date of admission to pension, and you may need to use the muster books (WO12) to get a date, but it is very rewarding if you find the man you want.
General registers of discharges from 1871 to 1884 are in WO121/223-238. Registers of men discharged without pension between 1884 and 1887 are in WO 121/239-257. Certificates of service of soldiers awarded deferred pensions, 1838-1896, are in WO131.
Two series of returns of service of NCOs and men survive from the early nineteenth century. The first series contains statements of periods of service and of liability to service abroad on 24 June 1806 and are in WO25/871-1120. The second series contains returns of NCOs and men, not known to be dead or totally disqualified for military service, who had been discharged between 1783 and 1810 (WO25/1121-1131). Both series are arranged by regiment and then alphabetically by surname.
Records of service of soldiers in the Royal Horse Artillery between 1803 and 1863 are in WO69. They include attestation papers and show name, age, description, place of birth, trade, and dates of service, of promotions, of marriage and of discharge or death. These records are arranged under the unit in which the individual last served, which can be ascertained from indexes and posting books in WO69/779-782, 801-839.
There is also an incomplete series of registers of deceased, discharged or deserted men in the Royal Artillery (1772-1774, 1816-1873) in WO69/583-597, 644—647, arranged by artillery regiment. A number of miscellaneous pay lists and other records of the Royal Artillery, 1692-1876, are in WO54/672-755.
www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
Hi Ruby !!! :D
-
Hi Moli
My GGF served with the 25th Foot and I am compiling a data base of them. They had a Depot and two battalions so they were in at least three places at any one time. The only reference I have to Scotland is one part of them was in Glasgow in 1866. They only really became a Scottish Regiment in the late 1880s. Although many regiments with Depots in the south of England would send recruiting sergeants to Glasgow, Birmingham and Manchester. It could be that they married while he was on furlough. My GGF enlisted in 1871 in Gosport/Portsmouth.
They spent a lot of time in Ireland during the 1870s, and that is where my GGF met his wife. I will check out Francis, so give me a prod in a week or two. Have you got any places and dates of their children’s births?
What occupation is on the death certificate, and have you found him in the 1881 census? There is a Francis Thompson in the 1881 of the right age and a soldier but he was born in Staffordshire, so are you sure you have the right death?
Ken
-
Can anyone tell me about the 61st Foot? Sorry to butt in on the thread but I thought whilst the experts are here, I would ask.
Hi Annie, nice to see you - how you doin'?
Moli, if you have emailed me - I have to tell you that my email is down, bloomin' virgin media - its been dodgy for a few weeks and just conked out this morning. I'll get back to you when I'm able to access my emails again.
Regards
Ruby
-
Thank you, all, for the replies.
Ruby, I have sent you a pm; the pictures might prove informative about the military during the 1870s. I’ve applied for his records from the National Archives, Liverpool Annie.
Ken, the BMD certificates of the Thompson line I am following is not the one in the 1881 census of Francis Thompson born in Fazeley, Staffordshire. The certificates I have state that my Francis Thompson/Thomson, unless he was very “economical with the truth,” was born in Scotland to parents called Joseph Thomson and Agnes Neilson. (I have to admit that I have not yet been able to trace them.) In his second marriage in 1876, Francis give his father’s name as Joseph whose occupation was ‘weaver’. Yet, on his 1869/1870 marriage certificate, this ‘weaver’ was a ‘deceased labourer’.
Francis went from being a private in the army in 1870 to a potter living in Stoke on Trent in 1871. (RG10; Piece: 2869; Folio: 16; Page: 26; GSU roll: 83638*) The first wife, Catherine, died in 1874 and Francis remarried in 1876, this time to Ester Bates. The 1881 census has Est(h)er Thompson (nee Bates) in her sister’s household (Annie Smith, RG11; Piece: 2719; Folio: 83; Page: 11; GSU roll: 1341652* ) but Francis is nowhere to be found. (That is, I have not been able to find him.) On his death certificate (potter’s asthma), 26 March 1882, the person present at his death and reporting the event was the next door neighbour…not the wife! Est(h)er remarried within four months of Francis’s death so I assume they were estranged. There were no children from the union with Catherine or Esther as far as I know. But, Est(h)er did have a child out of wedlock one year prior to her marriage to Francis Thompson. The child never bore the THOMPSON name but she did name him Thomas. (Suspicious?)
I know very little about this gentleman. I am attempting to build a picture by following the trail backwards to find out where Francis and his regiment might have been before he turns up in Dundee.
*I hope this is the correct method to refer/quote a census roll.
regards
moli
-
Can anyone tell me about the 61st Foot? Sorry to butt in on the thread but I thought whilst the experts are here, I would ask.
Hi Annie, nice to see you - how you doin'?
Moli, if you have emailed me - I have to tell you that my email is down, bloomin' virgin media - its been dodgy for a few weeks and just conked out this morning. I'll get back to you when I'm able to access my emails again.
Regards
Ruby
Hi Ruby
... the 61st became the Gloucestershire regiment !! don't know what time frame you want but thought this maybe of interest !!
http://members.tripod.com/~Glosters/index-4.html
Annie :)
-
Hi Ruby
In the 1862 Army List (compiled at the end of 1861) their Depot was in Pembroke and the battalion were in Aldershot. I think they spent 1863 in Aldershot as well. Before 1881 they only had one battalion and their nominal name was the South Gloucestershires. I don't have another Army List until the early 1880s.
Ken
-
Hi Annie and Ken
Many thanks for this information - its a bit of a strange one. This is the information I have:
1861 George Morrison is in the Raglan Barracks Married Men's Quarters in Stoke Demerel, Devonport with his wife Margaret Tracy who is from Cork.
Between 1869 and 1872 he is in the Dundee Directories with an occupation of Drill Instructor, Drill Hall and lives at 3 Mid Street in Dundee.
In the 1871 census he is still living at 3 Mid Street in the St Clement district of Dundee with his wife and two sons, one born in England about 1861 and one born in Dundee 1867. His occupation is given as volunteer instructor.
In 1879 his death certificate, age 52, says he was a Sergeant with the 61st Foot.
I wonder if the registrar made a mistake on the death certificate - is it strange for a Scottish man to be in a Gloucestershire regiment? Also it looks, from the link you sent to me Annie, that the Gloucesters were in India for a very long time, from 1845 until 1860. I can't find a marriage record for him.
Any other suggestions would be gratefully received.
Thanks
Ruby
-
Hi Ruby
You should really ignore the county affiliation of regiments before the 1870s as the Depot of most regiments was not permanent, but wandered around the British Isles. Even though the battalion was in the East Indies they probably retained a Depot in the UK. Reading the link provided by Annie they would clearly need a constant supply of replacements.
It is also possible that he was serving out in India with another regiment and transferred to the 61st Foot out there. If you cannot find his papers you will have to track him using the Muster Books. They arrived back from Mauritius on 15 Sept 1860.
He was clearly in the 61st Foot as a Regular and after discharge became an Instructor to a volunteer outfit. You will have to check with the local record office, but I think there was one called the Angus Militia.
Here is a link to researching the military - http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/militaryhistory/army/step4.htm
If you cannot visit Kew you may be able to get the microfilm for the men discharged from the 61st Foot sent to your nearest LDS/FH Centre under the A2A scheme. Although there is a possibility that his papers followed him to the volunteers he joined.
If you cannot find his papers you will have to visit Kew and look at the Muster Books for the 61st Foot.
Ken
-
Hi Ken
Many thanks for this information. Had a little look at the online stuff on the NA site but no sign of a George Morrison and not much on the Angus Militia beyond 1835. Muster books and papers seem to be split between Kew and Scotland so I think this is one I will leave for another day.
I really appreciate your help Ken. Thank you.
Ruby
-
For most of the 19th century the Militia came under to the Lord Lieutenant of the county, rather than the War Office. So it is always worth checking local record offices as well as Kew.
ken
-
Hi Ken,
In your reply earlier in this thread about Francis Thompson of the 25th Foot, you said to "give you a prod" as you were going to check on Francis. Well, I'm prodding! Any luck in unearthing details, no matter how trivial?
regards,
moli