RootsChat.Com
England (Counties as in 1851-1901) => Leicestershire => England => Leicestershire Lookup Requests => Topic started by: hollow on Tuesday 22 April 08 08:05 BST (UK)
-
Hi,
Would someone be able to look up a ANN and WILLIAM RATCLIFFE on the 1891 & 1901 census. Ann was born around 1859/1861 in Staffordshire. Not sure where William was born. Found their marriage on freebmd in 1881 Dec q, at Ashby De La Zouch.
Recently found two of their children staying with grandma on the 1901 census at Oakthorpe/ Donisthorpe, Ashby De La Zouch. John & Kate were both born at Drakelow, Staffs.
Thank you
Jan
-
Hi Jan,
1901
RG13/2640 53 4
Drakelow, Derbyshire
Grove Cottages
William Ratcliffe, head, 40, Waggoner on Farm, b. Derby Ticknall
Anne, wife, 40, b. Stafford Edgeford
George, son, 12, b. Derby Drakelow
John, son, 5, b. do.
Kate E, dau, 2, b. do.
Evelyn G, dau, 11 mo, b. do.
:)
-
1891
RG12/2199 38 1
Drakelow, Derbyshire
1 Grove Cottages
William Ratcliff, head, 30, Ag lab, Derbyshire Ticknall
Ann, wife, 31, b. Staffordshire Porta Bella
Alice, dau, 8, scholar, b. Drakelow
Mary Eliza, dau, 6, scholar, b. do.
Sarah, dau, 4, b. do.
George, son, 2, b. do.
Emmanuel Langford, boarder, s, 19, Ag lab, b. Staffordshire Ockerhill
-
Hi,
Thank you very much for your quick reply and suppling the info that I need.
This is definately the people I am searching for.
The 1891 census supplies it as Emmanuel Langford was Ann's brother.
I can now take another step in my search.
Thank you for making my day.
Jan
-
My pleasure! :)
Any use?
1871
RG10/2899 80 16
Repton, Derbyshire
Ticknall
Joseph Ratcliffe, head, 35, Ag lab, b. Leicester Coleorton
Lucy, wife, 35, b. Derby Ticknall
William, son, 10, scholar, b. do.
George, son, 8, scholar, b. do.
Margaret A, dau, 3, b. do.
In 1861, Joseph and Lucy are staying with Lucy's mother Ann Wilkinson.
-
I am not sure yet as haven't got any info about William's parents.
But I will definately hang onto it.
Thank you very much for all your help.
Best Wishes
Jan
-
Keep him in mind - he's the only candidate I see :)
1861 shows him as William T - he was William Thomas, wasn't he? :)
-
Hi
Yes thank you. Will hold onto this info and when I get a bit further can refer.
Thank you once again
Jan