RootsChat.Com
England (Counties as in 1851-1901) => London & Middlesex Lookup Requests => London and Middlesex => England => London & Middlesex Completed Lookup Requests => Topic started by: moltom on Thursday 11 January 07 19:02 GMT (UK)
-
If anyone happens to be searching the Marylebone 1831 census, please let me know if you come across the CULL household, headed by Robert or Mary.
They were living in Maidenhead Court in 1841.
Thanks from Moltom
-
Hello, the 1831 Marylebone census only shows the surname of the head of the household & only vague info on the other inhabitants eg how many males, how many females etc. There is a surname index, but no entry for Cull. Sorry!
-
Thanks for that info.
At least I now know that the Culls were probably still in Hampshire in 1831.
Good luck with your own research.
Moltom
-
Hello Telesnap
I am searching for any info on Richard Cullen and Harriet Shalders. They were married at St George, Hanover Square in 1833.
I can't find them on the 1841 census. They were in Marylebone in 1851. I just wondered if either of them were on the 1831 census. Richard was a domestic coachman in 1851 born in Kent. Harriet was born in Norfolk.
If you are searching the Marylebone 1831 census again I would be very grateful for any help.
Thank you.
RBC
-
Hi RBC,
not sure when I'll next be at Westminster archives (where the index is), but if you don't mind waiting a few weeks I'll add your names to my 'to do' list. :)
-
Hi Telesnap,
Thank you so much. I am trying to work out the best way to get to London for the day. There is so much I would like to do.
Best wishes.
RBC
-
Hi RBC, sorry this took so long! The 1831 has no Christian names & comprises numbers in columns under various categories. There are 2 entires for Cullen:
Alpha Road no. 32, householder CULLEN, 2 families occupying house, none in trade, manufacture, handicraft or agriculture. 4 males & 4 females, all males over 20 years old. Of the males, none are occupiers of land, ag labs, or in manufacture, retail trade or handicrafts. 2 of the males are 'wholesale merchants, bankers, professional & other educated men'. 1 of the males is a labourer not in agriculture. 1 of the males is classed as 'retired tradesmen superannuated labourers, disabled/insane'. 1 of the males is a servant under 20 years old. [this must be wrong, if all the males are over 20] 1 of the females is a servant.
Blandford Street no 26, householder CULLEN, 4 families occupying house, none in trade, manufacture or handicraft. 1 family in agriculture. 4 males, 7 females, 3 of the males are over 20 years old. Of the males, none are occupiers of land, ag labs or in manufacture. 2 of the males are in retail trade or handicraft. 1 of the males is a labourer not in agriculture. None of the males are classed as 'educated men' etc, none are retired etc, & none are servants. None of the females are servants.
There was nothing under Shalders, the only potential spelling variant was Shaller (or poss. Shallen):
Charles Street MH no 19, householder SHALLER, 3 families occupying house, none in trade, manufacture or handicraft, 2 families in agriculture. 6 males, 7 females, 2 of the males over 20 years old. None of the males are occupiers of land, ag labs or in manufacture. 1 male is in trade or handicraft. 1 male is classed as 'wholesale merchants, bankers, professional & other educated men'. None of the males are labourers not in agriculture, none are classed as retired etc & none are servants. 3 of the females are servants.
Phew! If you PM me your email address, I could send you a scan with the columns set out, which might be easier to make sense of. :)
-
Hello Telesnap
Thank you very much for all your trouble, especially all that typing. I seems a shame but I would really love a scan. I have never seen any Census records earlier than the 1841.
I am not sure yet if any could be an ancestor. I wish I could leave the Cullen part of my family alone. I just keep going back to it, over and over again. Perhaps one day another Cullen researcher will turn up something relevent. When I first saw the records for 1851 and 1861 it all seemed so straight forward. I was even lucky enough to find a Pallots marriage record for 1833. Since then nothing.
I hope you are having good luck with your searching. I will send a PM.
RBC