RootsChat.Com

General => The Common Room => Topic started by: sallysmum on Wednesday 20 December 06 20:18 GMT (UK)

Title: Assumptions being made - help required
Post by: sallysmum on Wednesday 20 December 06 20:18 GMT (UK)
Just had my first foray to the records office and would like some help interpreting the results I found.  According to the census, gt gt grandfather James Spence was born in 1814 in Spennithorne or Harmby N Yorks.  I searched the christenings for that year and surrounding years but no joy.  I did however find a James Spence b 1809 in Spennithorne.  Now because the census indicated that he was born in 1814 I am hesitant to accept this as being gt gt grandfather.  Can I have some comments and maybe ideas as to how to progress this further.

Second result.  According to the same census, his wife Mary was born in 1809 in Gilling, Yorks.  No problem – I find her as the illegitimate daughter of Elizabeth Leeming.  Hooray!  I can hopefully go back 1 generation from this.  I searched the Gilling records but no Leemings!  Thinking a little more laterally, Mary and James settled in Leyburn so I searched the Leyburn records for Leemings – found an Elizabeth Leeming’s christening in 1787.  No marriage records for an Elizabeth Leeming until a few years after Mary was born.  Can I assume this Elizabeth Leeming is Mary’s mother?  I have found her death and have sent off for the cert to see if this gives any further info.  Again any comments and ideas of how to verify this information.

Sallysmum
Title: Re: Assumptions being made - help required
Post by: wrjones on Wednesday 20 December 06 20:26 GMT (UK)
The first thing is that I take it the years were 1800's!I would be more inclined to take the Year of Birth from a Parish Register,accepting that everything else fits.Birthyears given in Census Entries are none too reliable.

Regards
William Russell Jones
Cefn Mawr
Wrexham
Title: Re: Assumptions being made - help required
Post by: sallysmum on Wednesday 20 December 06 20:33 GMT (UK)
oops yes - just modified my post (I read and reread it - thought it was OK!)  So even tho Mary's birth year tallied, I fear James' didn't - you would be inclined to accept that maybe James was B 1809?

Sallysmum
Title: Re: Assumptions being made - help required
Post by: wrjones on Wednesday 20 December 06 20:41 GMT (UK)
There are all sorts of reasons why people gave an incorrect Birthyear in the Census.Pride or even ignorance,as you have to remember people in those days did not celebrate Birthdays as people may do today,even if they knew them!

Regards
William Russell Jones
Cefn Mawr
Wrexham.
Title: Re: Assumptions being made - help required
Post by: Valda on Wednesday 20 December 06 21:23 GMT (UK)
Next door to the family in 1841 in Leyburn is Christopher Leeming aged 70 an ag lab.

Deaths Dec 1841   
LEEMING  Christopher    Leyburn  24 269

Does he have any connection to Elizabeth Leeming?
Was Elizabeth also Leyburn in 1841?

James Spence is completely consistent with his age on every census from 1841 to 1881 and also on the age given on his death. He married Mary Leeming in 1832. If he was truthful on his marriage then to be consistent with the age given on the censuses James would have married under age  - under the age of 21). The marriage entry should specify that he was marrying under age and the banns book (if the marriage was by banns, or the marriage allegation if the marriage was by licence) should give the information who gave permission for him to marry.

Regards

Valda
Title: Re: Assumptions being made - help required
Post by: Pels. on Wednesday 20 December 06 21:55 GMT (UK)

Hi Sallysmum,

Regarding the census there were only two people by the name of James Spence listed in this area, one born in Wensley and the other born in Spennithorne/Harmby.
Both accounted for on the IGI records, the first mentioned, born in 1810 and the latter 1809 in Spennithorne.
Like you I can't quite fathom why the census returns were consistantly wrong, but as was said before, the parish records are the ones to be believed.

Pels :)

Title: Re: Assumptions being made - help required
Post by: sallysmum on Thursday 21 December 06 08:40 GMT (UK)
Valda - once again thanks for your insight.  I keep forgetting to return to the census!  I don't know if Christopher Leeming is related.  I had only just found Elizabeth's christening record when I was booted out of of the records office, but I did find Christopher's death record on route along with an older Mary, of a similar age to Christopher.  Elizabeth's parents?  More work in the records office required.

Elizabeth married a William Fishwick in 1815 and can be found on the 1841 and 1851.  I think she died in 1860.  Interestingly William was a cordwainer and James Spence lists his occupation as shoemaker on his first son's christening.  Coincidence?  Well there is also another Spence in Leyburn who is also a shoemaker - I don't as yet know the relationship of him to my James.

Whilst going thru the birth records, I also found an entry for a Thomas Leeming - Elizabeth's brother?  Now Mary names 2 of her children (neither survived) Thomas.

A lot of coincidences here pointing to the fact that maybe this Leeming family is mine.  However, why would Elizabeth go to Gilling to have her illegitimate child, Mary?

Back to James.  I have the Banns - no mention that special licence was required - thus does this suggest he was of age, ie born 1809 rather than 1814? 

Pels - I can well see how one can get on the wrong track here.  Knowing he settled in Leyburn, if I didn't have the census info that he was born in Spennithorne, I would have assumed he could have been the guy born in Wensley.

Sallysmum
Title: Re: Assumptions being made - help required
Post by: sillgen on Thursday 21 December 06 09:20 GMT (UK)
Don't forget that the IGI is not full coverage.  There may be several other James Spence entries in parishes which are not indexed.   Next time you go to the record office take a quick look at all the transcriptions of the parish registers which they will have on the shelves - much quicker than looking at films.   If you see a lot of Spence entries then you can search that particular parish on film.
Have you been in contact with the Upper Dales Family History Group?     They have a very active email group who are very helpful.   They are part of the Cleveland FH Group.
Andrea
Title: Re: Assumptions being made - help required
Post by: sallysmum on Thursday 21 December 06 09:29 GMT (UK)
Just had a closer look at the 1841 where Christopher Leeming is listed - he's not next door, he's living with the Spences - bingo!  Can I surmise that he is thus Mary's grandfather - oohhh can't wait to get back to the records office now!

Sallysmum
Title: Re: Assumptions being made - help required
Post by: Valda on Thursday 21 December 06 11:03 GMT (UK)
You don't need a special licence to marry under age just permission from a parent or guardian. The marriage register itself should state one of the party was under age and the banns (or licence if they had married by licence) should give details of who was giving the permission. Under age people if they could get away with it, often didn't admit they were under age because of the extra hassle, so this alone doesn't prove James was indeed over 21 but if he had been under age it would have helped confirm the age given on the censuses.

Other parishes did not open their doors to unmarried mothers giving birth in their area so the question isn't why did Elizabeth go to Gilling to give birth to Mary. She would have to have been established there and have settlement, otherwise Gilling would have moved her back to Leyburn. They wouldn't have wanted an illegitimate child and mother charged to their rates if they could have helped it. Try checking the poor law for any evidence of Elizabeth and Mary - settlement/removal and or a bastardy order.
 
James does not just give Spennithorne as his place of birth - he only gives that once, Harmby twice and 'Throstle Nest' once - which is a very specific place. I believe from Googling there is a Throstle Nest farm at Harmby.
"HARMBY, in the parish of Spennithorne wapentake of Hang West & liberty of Richmondshire; ¾ mile NW. of Spennithorne, 1 mile E. of Leyburn. Population, 194."
If you search on the censuses for any other Spences giving Throstle Nest as a birthplace you find one on the 1871 census.

RG10 4743 folio 126
North Riding of Yorkshire Lunatic Asylum Clifton  Yorkshire .
Richd Spence  60  Throstle Nest Patient Widower Shoemaker

Back tracking him on censuses you get

1861 census RG9 3544 folio 98
North and East Riding of Yorkshire Lunatic Asylum Clifton  Yorkshire  
Richard Spence  51  East Witton, Yorkshire, Patient Widower Shoemaker

1851 census HO107 2379 folio 155
West Witton  Yorkshire  
Richard Spence 47 Harmby, Yorkshire,  Head Widower Master Shoemaker
Elizabeth Spence  17 West Witton, Yorkshire, Daughter Housekeeper
Hauxwell Spence 8  West Witton, Yorkshire, Son  
Susanna Spence 5  West Witton, Yorkshire, Daughter
Jackson Spence  1 West Witton, Yorkshire,  Son  

1841 census HO107 1254/14 folio 8 page 11
West Witton  Yorkshire  
Richard Spencer 30  Yorkshire Shoemaker
Catharine Spencer 30  Yorkshire
Elizabeth Spencer 7  Yorkshire
John Spencer 6 Yorkshire
William Spencer 4  Yorkshire
Richard Spencer 1  Yorkshire

From the IGI
RICHARD SPENCE  
CATHERINE JACKSON  
Marriage:  About 14 MAY 1833   West Witton, Yorkshire
 
And of course rather tantalising the earlier two Spennithorne baptisms are

JAMES SPENCE  
Christening:  31 DEC 1809   Spennithorne, Yorkshire
Father:  JOHN SPENCE  
Mother:  ALICE  

RICHARD SPENCE  
Christening:  13 AUG 1809   Spennithorne, Yorkshire
Father:  JOHN SPENCE  
Mother:  ALICE  

Regards

Valda
Title: Re: Assumptions being made - help required
Post by: Valda on Thursday 21 December 06 11:35 GMT (UK)
Elizabeth Fishwick born Leyburn on the 1851 census gives her age as 74 (birth circa 1777).
Christopher Leeming in Leyburn on the 1841 census was aged 70 (adult ages rounded down to the nearest 5 on the 1841 census) so a birth circa 1771 - 1767.

From the IGI the three Leeming baptisms in Wensley (covering Leyburn) are

CHRS. LEEMING 
Christening:  12 SEP 1773   Wensley, Yorkshire

MARTIN LEMING   
Christening:  27 DEC 1775   Wensley, Yorkshire
Father:  CHRS. LEMING 
(a baker in Ripon 1841 and 1851 censuses)

ELIZ. LEEMING 
Christening:  05 APR 1778   Wensley, Yorkshire
Father:  CHRS. LEEMING 

From the National Burial Index
20th June   1821   
Christopher LEEMING 82   
Yorks N/R   Wensley, Holy Trinity

18th August 1827   
Mary LEEMING 97   
Yorks N/R   Wensley, Holy Trinity

Regards

Valda
Title: Re: Assumptions being made - help required
Post by: sallysmum on Thursday 21 December 06 12:58 GMT (UK)
Hi Valda - these last 2 posts are begining to put the picture together - many thanks for your time and knowledge.

James Spence's marraige - I only picked up the Banns - no mention of him being under age here.  Will have to go back and see the register (didn't think to pick that up aswell) to check it out

Elizabeth Leeming's marriage to William Fishwick - Martin Leeming is one of the witnesses

Elizabeth's stay in Gilling - where do I find hte bastardy orders/poor law records - are these in the records office again?

Cheers
Sallysmum
Title: Re: Assumptions being made - help required
Post by: Valda on Thursday 21 December 06 13:26 GMT (UK)
Yes any poor law records (settlement, removal and bastardy orders) if they have survived (or were ever generated in the first place) should be in the county record office.
The asylum records - if you want to delve away slightly from your direct line (asylum records are detailed and I think fascinating) are held at the Borthwick Institute

Regards

Valda
Title: Re: Assumptions being made - help required
Post by: sallysmum on Saturday 23 December 06 11:31 GMT (UK)
Just received death cert fo Elizabeth Fishwick - Mary Spence was the informant - more confidence to the Leyburn Leemings being mine!  Thanks all

Sallysmum
Title: Re: Assumptions being made - help required
Post by: Pinetree on Monday 08 January 07 18:20 GMT (UK)
Sallysmum,

I think we are researching the same SPENCE family - I'll send you more information by PM.

Pinetree
Title: Re: Assumptions being made - help required
Post by: Jenzzzz11 on Monday 08 January 07 23:17 GMT (UK)
Hi, my name is Jennifer Hawkswell and my gt gt Grandad was John Hauxwell b.1863 and married Catherine Spence b.1862. They were married in 1883 and I think that there is a definate link in our ancestors. I have managed to trace a few names back to a John Spence b.1788c who married Alice Spence. If anyone has anymore information on the Spence family, I know Pinetree does, then I would be most grateful. Thanks Jeni.
Title: Re: Assumptions being made - help required
Post by: sallysmum on Tuesday 09 January 07 08:11 GMT (UK)
Hi jenzzzzz

I have PMed you - I can't believe from my simple query I have discovered another rellie - how amazing is that!

sallysmum
Title: Re: Assumptions being made - help required
Post by: Jenzzzz11 on Monday 15 January 07 16:54 GMT (UK)
Hi my name is Jennifer Hawkswell and I've come to a stop in searching for my ancestors on my Dads side. My Great great Grandfather was called John Hauxwell b.1863 in Moreton on Swale, Leyburn, Yorkshire. He married Catherine Spence (b.1862 West Witton, Leyburn, Yorkshire) in 1883. The problem is that I can't find John Hauxwell on any Census before 1881 and I really want to trace his parents as the Hauxwell/Hawkswell side is the main link down to me! I've tried searching different spellings, changing years and allsorts but found nothing! I have managed to trace a lot of the Spence side (his wifes side) but need some more info on John. If anyone has ANY information or knows how I could find more out please could you let me know! Thanks, Jeni.
Title: Re: Assumptions being made - help required
Post by: Pels. on Monday 15 January 07 17:26 GMT (UK)

Hi Jennifer,

Firstly I think it should be Morton on Swale - I will check this out for you!!

Kind regards,

Pels  :)
Title: Re: Assumptions being made - help required
Post by: sallysmum on Monday 15 January 07 17:28 GMT (UK)
Hi Jen
Have you sent off for John's birth cert - that should give his parent's names

Wendy
Title: Re: Assumptions being made - help required
Post by: sillgen on Monday 15 January 07 18:27 GMT (UK)
Jeni
Try the Dales Family History group - part of Cleveland FHS.   They have a very active email group who are all experts in that area.
Andrea
Title: Re: Assumptions being made - help required
Post by: Valda on Monday 15 January 07 21:01 GMT (UK)
On the 1891 census John an agricultural labourer is married in Carperby Cum Thoresby, aged 30. He gives his birthplace as Morton on Swale.
In 1901 the family is in Thornton Steward. John a 39 year old horseman on a farm, consistently gives his birthplace as Morton on Swale.

I can't see John on the 1881 census?
What information does his marriage certificate give about his father?

Regards

Valda
Title: Re: Assumptions being made - help required
Post by: Pels. on Tuesday 16 January 07 07:17 GMT (UK)

Hi everyone,

I have a strong feeling the missing link is in the Crakehall/Burneston area, but I can't put my finger on it at this early hour?

Could someone please check to see if there is a possible connection to this neck of the woods?

Pels  :)


Title: Re: Assumptions being made - help required
Post by: Jenzzzz11 on Tuesday 16 January 07 10:53 GMT (UK)
Hi Guys,

I have managed to find a couple of possibilities for John Hauxwell in earlier census'. But they need some more investigation. The correct spelling of John's name is HAUXWELL. However on Ancestry.co.uk's website he appears on the 1901 census as John Hawlxwell (which I think is someone not understanding the writing on the census!)

In 1891 he appears as John Hauxwell.

In 1881 he appears as John Hawkswell (my name), but the birthplace has moved to Crakehall and not Moreton on Swale.

After hours of searching I think I might have found him on Crakehall's records for 1871, if finds a John Hankswell aged 6 which would make his birth year 1865, but I'm pretty sure that he was born in 1863. It says that this John was born in Moreton on Swale and gives the parents names of Dorothy and James both born in 1818. And 3 sisters called Harriet b.1857, Mary b.1852 and Philas b. 1862. Now although all this excited me (the 1871 census) I can't be sure that it is him. I'm going to try to order his birth certificate, but I want to be sure which John Hauxwell is right! John's Dad was a Green Grocer and his Mum was a Servant.

Hopefully this might lead to some more information!

Thanks, Jeni.
Title: Re: Assumptions being made - help required
Post by: Pels. on Tuesday 16 January 07 11:04 GMT (UK)


Hi Jeni,

Brilliant news, I think you are on the right track here!! I had found this family living in Crakehall - and John in 1881. The similarities were too much of a coincidence!


Pels
Title: Re: Assumptions being made - help required
Post by: Pels. on Tuesday 16 January 07 11:10 GMT (UK)


Here is something that might be of interest for you to browse through:

http://www.glenlodge.me.uk/crakehallindex.html
Title: Re: Assumptions being made - help required
Post by: Pels. on Tuesday 16 January 07 14:26 GMT (UK)


Hi again,

I've just checked the 1871 on Ancestry after looking at the transcriptions on the link I sent you.

Ian Hancock, the owner of the web site has transcribed their name as Haukswell in 1871.
Ancestry have confused the issue by transcibing the name as Hankswell, on the actual return it clearly reads as Haukswell.

I checked the family in 1881, ref. RG11/4871, folio 82, page 10. The name is now written as Hauxwell.

Quite sure you are already aware of all this, but it's sometimes reassuring to know that someone else is reaching the same conclusions!

I will keep my fingers crossed for the outcome of the certificate!

Kind regards,

Pels

Title: Re: Assumptions being made - help required
Post by: Valda on Tuesday 16 January 07 19:16 GMT (UK)
1861 census RG9 3669 folio 44
Holy Moon Patrick Brompton  Yorkshire   
James Hawxwell 42  Bedale Head Married Hind
Dorothy Hawxwell 42 Brafferton Wife Married
Thomas Hawxwell  12  Bedale Son 
Eleanor Hawxwell  11  Bedale Daughter 
Mary Hawxwell 9  Bedale Daughter
Elizabeth Hawxwell 7  Bedale Daughter 
Harriot Hawxwell 4  Bedale Daughter 
Margaret Hawxwell  2  Bedale Daughter 
Fellas Hawxwell  13mths  Patrick Brompton Daughter 

Hind = 1) Domestic servant 2) A skilled farm labourer (Scotland)

Births Mar 1861   
Hautwell  Phillis    Leyburn  9d 462

1851 census HO107 2378 folio 106
Crakehall  Yorkshire 
James Hawkswill 33 Crakehall, Yorkshire,  Head  Married Ag labourer
Dorothy Hawkswill  32  Helperby, Yorkshire, Wife Married 
Ann Hawkswill 7  Crakehall, Yorkshire,  Daughter   
James Hawkswill 5  Crakehall, Yorkshire,  Son 
Thomas Hawkswill  3  Crakehall, Yorkshire,  Son 
Ellen Hawkswill 1 Crakehall, Yorkshire,  Daughter 

Marriages Jun 1841   
CRAVEN  Dorothy     Easingwold  24 335   
HAWKSWELL  James     Easingwold  24 335

1841 census HO107 1239/15 folio 3 page 1
Helperby Brafferton  Yorkshire   
William Craven 50  Yorkshire Ag labourer
Ellen Craven 50 Yorkshire
Dorothy Craven 22  Yorkshire

1841 census HO107 1250/4 folio 6 page 5
Little Crakehall Bedale  Yorkshire
James Hawkeswell 60  Yorkshire Gardener
Ann Hawkeswell 60  Yorkshire
John Hawkeswell 30  Yorkshire
James Hawkeswell 20  Yorkshire Butcher
John Hawkeswell 10  Yorkshire
Ann Hawkeswell 12  Yorkshire

Regards

Valda
Title: Re: Assumptions being made - help required
Post by: Jenzzzz11 on Tuesday 16 January 07 20:20 GMT (UK)
Thanks everyone for all your help! I've got so much information to chew on now! I think it is the right family so going to look into buying John Hauxwell's birth certificate. The most frustrating thing about searching for your ancestors is not only the mispellings of names but the overuse of forenames! Everyone appears to be called John or James, keep getting very confused! If anyone finds anything else, small or big please let me know as it's all very interesting and useful! Thanks, Jeni Hawkswell.
Title: Re: Assumptions being made - help required
Post by: Arethusa on Thursday 01 December 11 13:28 GMT (UK)
I found this entry on the 1901 census by accident, as I was looking for Elizabeth Spence at the time

Workhouse

SPENCE Hauxwell/inmate/S/59/Yks/Witton West - feeble minded from birth
Title: Re: Assumptions being made - help required
Post by: angelfish58 on Friday 02 December 11 09:15 GMT (UK)
As this is an old thread you probably already have this but I'll post it anyway just in case. From the Wensley MIs
"In loving memory of James Spence who d 20 Dec 1882 aged 69 yrs. Also of Mary his wife who d 1(9) April 1891 aged 83 yrs. Also of two sons who d in infancy. Also of Thomas their son born 12 Nov 1832 d 31 Mar 1835. Also Elizabeth Ann Foster daughter of the above who d 14 Dec 1908 aged 71 yrs"