RootsChat.Com

England (Counties as in 1851-1901) => Kent Lookup Requests => Kent => England => Kent Completed Lookup Requests => Topic started by: JanieJ on Thursday 26 October 06 12:01 BST (UK)

Title: 1841 Census PINGRAM
Post by: JanieJ on Thursday 26 October 06 12:01 BST (UK)
Hi,

Seeking to find 1841 census (or any pre 51 records) for:

PINGRAM Joseph      b1822       Deptford, Kent.

Occupation:   Warehouseman/ Engine stoker/ Engineer Steam boats

Joseph married Elizabeth (maiden name u/kn) b1818 Durham, Sunderland.
Children John, Elizabeth, Eliza, Grace E, Joseph, b between 1846 and 1858.
All born Bermondsey apart from Eliza b c1849 Sunderland.

1851 census living Sunderland
1861/71 census all living in Bermondsey.


Appreciate any help to uncover Joseph and Elizabeth's history. Thank you

JJ
Title: Re: 1841 Census PINGRAM
Post by: Caskidd on Thursday 26 October 06 12:07 BST (UK)
Found marriage i think

Joseph Pingram & Elizabeth Findley married Sunderland June Qtr 1842 Vol 24 Page 236

Hope this helps
Cathy
Title: Re: 1841 Census PINGRAM
Post by: JanieJ on Thursday 26 October 06 12:09 BST (UK)
Cheers Cathy,

It certainly does.

Thank you!!!

JJ
Title: Re: 1841 Census PINGRAM
Post by: casalguidi on Wednesday 23 January 08 18:08 GMT (UK)
Hi JJ

Being as this is an old request, you may well have the information by now but if not, there is this entry:

1841

Spring St, St Paul Deptford

Joseph PINGRAM 20 b.Kent
John 15 b.Kent
John LYONS 50 ag lab b.Kent
Mary 40 b.Kent

HO107/488 folio 19 page 31
............................

There are now some baptisms on the IGI http://www.familysearch for St Paul Deptford including that for a Joseph PEGRIM 1821 (batch number C009447) which looks a good fit given a possible slight transcription error with the surname.

Casalguidi :)
Title: Re: 1841 Census PINGRAM
Post by: JanieJ on Wednesday 23 January 08 21:53 GMT (UK)

Thank you very much Casalguidi!

I now see that Pingram has been mis- transcibed as Pingeam on the 41 census!!

Had given up on searching for 1841 with these guys but this info has helped me to re visit my search and makes sense of other info that I have. I now know that Elizabeth was formely a Findley although still not found her on the 1841 ... yet!

Really appreciate your help with this after so long.

JJ